The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyper-precarious lives: Migrants, work and forced labour in the Global North
Open accessAbstract
This paper unpacks the contested inter-connections between neoliberal work and welfare regimes, asylum and immigration controls, and the exploitation of migrant workers. The concept of precarity is explored as a way of understanding intensifying and insecure post-Fordist work in late capitalism. Migrants are centrally implicated in highly precarious work experiences at the bottom end of labour markets in Global North countries, including becoming trapped in forced labour. Building on existing research on the working experiences of migrants in the Global North, the main part of the article considers three questions. First, what is precarity and how does the concept relate to working lives? Second, how might we understand the causes of extreme forms of migrant labour exploitation in precarious lifeworlds? Third, how can we adequately theorize these particular experiences using the conceptual tools of forced labour, slavery, unfreedom and precarity? We use the concept of ‘hyper-precarity’ alongside notions of a ‘continuum of unfreedom’ as a way of furthering human geographical inquiry into the intersections between various terrains of social action and conceptual debate concerning migrants’ precarious working experiences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Migrant “Illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life
De Genova, N. P. (2002) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432 · Cited by 3,505
Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400101 · Cited by 2,998
A Place and Space for a Critical Geography of Precarity?
Waite, L. (2009) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00184.x · Cited by 458
Self-citation
Cited by
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2021) · Competition & Change · doi:10.1177/1024529420914473 · Cited by 429
(2018) · South Atlantic Quarterly · doi:10.1215/00382876-4374823 · Cited by 121
The experience of precarity: low-paid economic migrants’ housing in Manchester
Lombard, M. (2023) · Housing Studies · doi:10.1080/02673037.2021.1882663 · Cited by 74
“The interplay of exploitative employment with restrictive immigration regimes has led to the routine experience of precarity in migration in the UK (Lewis et al., 2015), and this is reflected in multiple dimensions, including housing.”
BackgroundMigrant sexual precarity through the lens of workplace litigation
Boucher, A. K. (2025) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.13160 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, H., Dwyer, P., Hodkinson, S., & Waite, L.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-09-17
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 580-600
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2109388920
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.