The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autonomy of Asylum?
Abstract
Amidst so many global-scale disruptions, we have witnessed a multitude of ensuing political spectacles of "crisis" choreographed within the frameworks of nation-states, reanimating nationalist projects, and commonly articulating themselves in the idiom of one or another reactionary populism from the genocidal pogroms against Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar/Burma to the unabashed mass murder of alleged "drug addicts" in the Philippines, from the recurrent assassination of Vladimir Putin's political rivals and critical journalists in Russia to the sweeping repression following the attempted coup in Turkey, from the anti-refugee show trials in Hungary to the Kenyan government's moves to forcibly evacuate and shut down the Dadaab refugee camp near the Somali border, from Britain's referendum vote to exit the European Union (EU) to the election of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency.In various forms, state authorities or those aspiring to state power have promulgated "emergency" measures as authoritarian remedies for one or another "crisis," by means of which "the people" must be protected (see De Genova, this volume).Interlaced with these hegemonic discursive formations of "crisis" and the effective staging of "crisis" across the world, and resulting more or less directly from the manifold states of exception that they have unleashed, countless real crises for the preservation and social reproduction of human life have ensued.These human disasters themselves have been rendered apprehensible to varying extents within hegemonic "crisis" formations as irruptions of one or another "humanitarian crisis" (Tazzioli et al. 2016).Such "humanitarian crises" are not uncommonly produced as cynical spectacles of misery for the further authorization of political manipulations and military interventions, even as they are derisively deployed to obfuscate other parallel human catastrophes altogether.In this special issue, we are interested in interrogating this proliferation of crises and "crisis"formations from the specific critical vantage point of the autonomy of migration.As the broad conceptual rubric for a heterogeneous field of critical inquiry and debate, pursued since the late
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Todos los espacios mencionados representan la obstinada “desobediencia espacial” de las personas migrantes (Tazzioli 2017) y su “política de la incorregibilidad” (De Genova, Garelli y Tazzioli 2018), una política radicalmente antiasimilacionista y abierta que rechaza el entendimiento normativo de la protección como algo separado de la libertad.”
From Huida, cimarronaje y santuario: genealogías críticas para deseurocentrar la historia del refugio en el Atlántico Negro (2022) · cites this paper as De Genova, Garelli y Tazzioli 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Illuminations: Essays and Reflections
Benjamin, W. W., & Zohn, H. (1968) · Cited by 3,848
Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor
Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2013) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822377542 · Cited by 2,107
Refugees and Exile: From "Refugee Studies" to the National Order of Things
Malkki, L. H. (1995) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002431 · Cited by 1,277
Spectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: the scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion
De Genova, N. (2013) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.783710 · Cited by 1,162
The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement
Genova, N. D., & Peutz, N. (2010) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · Cited by 1,011
The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies
(2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199652433.001.0001 · Cited by 989
Anderson, B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691593.001.0001 · Cited by 918
A plea for the ‘de-migranticization' of research on migration and integration
Dahinden, J. (2016) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129 · Cited by 906
Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography
Crampton, J., & Elden, S. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-2110 · Cited by 830
Lewis, H., Dwyer, P., Hodkinson, S. N., & Waite, L. (2014) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132514548303 · Cited by 642
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Bojadžijev Manuela Karakayali Serhat . 2010. “Recuperating the Sideshows of Capitalism: The Autonomy of Migration Today.” e-flux, no. 17. www.e-flux.com/journal/17/67379/recuperating-the-sideshows-of-capitalism-the-autonomy-of-migration-today.
- Bojadžijev, 2014, Was kommt nach dem Transnational Turn? Perspektiven für eine kritische Migrationsforschung” (“What Comes after the Transnational Turn? Perspectives for Critical Migration Research”), 10
- De Genova Nicholas . 2017d. “The ‘Migrant Crisis’ as Racial Crisis: Do Black Lives Matter in Europe?” Ethnic and Racial Studies, no. 44. Special Issue: Race and Crisis. dx.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1361543. · DOI
- Foucault, (1976) 2007, The Meshes of Power, 153
- Foucault, (1984) 1994, The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom, 281
- Khosravi, 2016, Deportation as a Way of Life for Young Afghan Men, 169
- Mezzadra, 2001, Diritto di fuga: Migrazioni, cittadinanza, globalizzazione (The Right to Escape: Migration, Citizenship, Globalization)
- Mezzadra, 2011, The Gaze of Autonomy: Capitalism, Migration, and Social Struggles, 121
- Mitropoulos, 2006, Autonomy, Recognition, Movement, Commoner, 5
- Picozza, 2017, ‘Dubliners’: Unthinking Displacement, Illegality, and Refugeeness within Europe’s Geographies of Asylum, 233
- Scheel, 2017, ‘The Secret Is to Look Good on Paper’: Appropriating Mobility within and against a Machine of Illegalization, 37
- Scheel, 2015, Politics of Protection, “New Keywords: Migration and Borders,” by Maribel Casas-Cortes et al., Cultural Studies, 29, 70
- Tazzioli, 2013, Migration (in) Crisis and ‘People Who Are Not of Our Concern’, 87
- Tazzioli, 2015, Migrant Struggles, “New Keywords: Migration and Borders,” by Maribel Casas-Cortes et al., Cultural Studies, 29, 80
Cited by
Picozza, F. (2022) · Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales · doi:10.1344/sn2022.26.36875 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Venue
- South Atlantic Quarterly
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2018-04-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-265
- ISSN
- 0038-2876
- 1527-8026
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 61
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autonomy of Asylum? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/00382876-4374823
- The paper
- Autonomy of Asylum? (2018). South Atlantic Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-4374823
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.