The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy
Open accessAbstract
Heightened concerns about long-term sustainability have of late enlivened debates around the circular economy (CE). Defined as a series of restorative and regenerative industrial systems, parallel socio-cultural transformations have arguably received less consideration to date. In response, this paper examines the contributions human geographical scholarship can make to CE debates, focusing on ‘generative spaces’ of diverse CE practices. Concepts infrequently discussed within human geography such as product service systems and ‘prosumption’ are explored, to argue that productive potential exists in bringing these ideas into conversation with ongoing human geographical research into practices, materialities, emergent political spaces and ‘everyday activism’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet
Tukker, A. (2004) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.414 · Cited by 2,456
Transparency in nonstate certification: consequences for accountability and legitimacy
Auld, G., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00016 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Circular economy as an essentially contested concept
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 · Cited by 1,568
Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 · Cited by 894
Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice
Suárez-Eiroa, B., Fernández, E., Méndez-Martínez, G., & Soto-Oñate, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271 · Cited by 688
Hobson, K., & Lynch, N. (2016) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012 · Cited by 520
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hobson, K.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-01-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-104
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2072869665
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 66.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132514566342
- The paper
- Hobson, K. (2016). Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514566342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
