Cited by 163Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsIndigenous Cultures and HistoryHistorical Geography and Geographical Thought

Geography and indigeneity I: Indigeneity, coloniality and knowledge

Open access
Radcliffe, Sarah A.·2017·Progress in Human Geography

Abstract

Why talk of indigeneity rather than of Indigenous peoples? This report examines the critical purchase on questions of inequality, subjectivity and power offered by critical geographies of indigeneity. In comparison with accounts that treat indigeneity as relational with nature and the more-than-human, the report highlights literature that examines indigeneity as relational with deeply historical, institutionalized and power-inflected ontologies. To think about settler colonialism as an ongoing effect, not a singular event, recognizes how patterns of engagement with and oppression of indigeneity pervade the colonial present and its geographies beyond the specific locales associated with Indigenous peoples. Finally, the report examines how indigeneity figures in the geography discipline’s knowledge production, and argues that worldly Indigenous ontologies are theorizing the world precisely because they are forced to apprehend, appraise and then rethink ‘universals’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0309132515612952

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indigeneity is fundamentally temporal, spatial and relational and cannot be disentangled from the (neo)colonial 'encounters' in which it is produced and reproduced until the present day.

    “The term is thus fundamentally temporal, spatial and relational and cannot be disentangled from the (neo)colonial 'encounters,' in which it is produced and reproduced until the present day (Radcliffe, 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Anthias, P. 2014. The Elusive Promise of Territory: An ethnographic case study of Indigenous land titling in the Bolivian Chaco. Unpublished PhD thesis. Department of Geography, University of Cambridge. Cambridge.
  2. Jazeel, T. 2014 Subaltern geographies: Geographical knowledge and postcolonial strategy. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 35: 88-103.
  3. Laing AF (2015) Resource sovereignties in Bolivia: Reconceptualizing the relationship between indigenous identity and the environment during the TIPNIS conflict. Bulletin of Latin American Research 34 (2): 149-166.
  4. Lester, A. and Dussart, F. 2012 Colonization and the Origins of Humanitarian Governance: Protecting Aborigines across the 19 th century British Empire. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  5. McHenry, M., Anwar-McHenry, J., Balilla, V.S. and Parkinson, R.M. 2013 The indigenous Aetas of Bataan, Philippines: Extraordinary genetic origins, modern history and land rights. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 34: 292-306.
  6. Radcliffe, S.A. forthcoming. The Difference Indigeneity Makes: Socio-natures, knowledges and contested policy. In M Raftopoulos and M Coletta (eds.) Provincializing Nature: Multidisciplinary approaches to the politics of the environment in Latin America. London, ILAS.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radcliffe, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Radcliffe, Sarah A.
Venue
Progress in Human Geography
Published
2016-07-10
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
220-229
ISSN
  • 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0288
OpenAlex
W2268046543
Cited by
163
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
FWCI
11.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Human Geography (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
Keywords
indigeneity, indigenous peoples, critical geography, settler colonialism, colonial present, Indigenous ontologies, more-than-human, relationality, inequality, subjectivity, power, knowledge production, coloniality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review