Cited by 190Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsUrban Planning and Landscape Design

Integrating sciences to sustain urban ecosystem services

Open access
Lundy, L., Wade, R.·2011·Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment

Abstract

Effective water management within urban settings requires robust multidisciplinary understanding and an appreciation of the value added to urban spaces by providing multifunctional green-blue spaces. Multifunctional landscapes where ecosystem service provisions are ‘designed-in’ can help ‘transition’ cities to more sustainable environments which are more resilient to changing future conditions. With benefits ranging from the supply of water, habitat and energy to pollutant removal, amenity and opportunities for recreation, urban water bodies can provide a focal point for reconnecting humans and nature in otherwise densely built-up areas. Managing water within urban spaces is an essential infrastructure requirement but has historically been undertaken in isolation from other urban functions and spatial requirements. Increasingly, because of the limits of space and need to respond to new drivers (e.g. mitigation of diffuse pollution), more sustainable approaches to urban water management are being applied which can have multiple functions and benefits. This paper presents a review of ecosystem services associated with water, particularly those in urban environments, and uses the emerging language of ecosystem services to provide a framework for discussion. The range of supporting, provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services associated with differing types of urban water bodies are identified. A matrix is then used to evaluate the results of a series of social, ecological and physical science studies co-located on a single stretch of a restored urban river. Findings identify the benefits of, but also barriers to, the implementation of a transdisciplinary research approach. For many, transdisciplinary research still appears to be on the edge of scientific respectability. In order to approach this challenge, it is imperative that we bring together discipline specific expertise to address fundamental and applied problems in a holistic way. The ecosystem services approach offers an exciting mechanism to support researchers in tackling research questions that require thinking beyond traditional scientific boundaries. The opportunity to fully exploit this approach to collaborative working should not be lost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0309133311422464

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ponds provide important contributions to society through the provision of ecosystem services.

    “Ponds also provide important contributions to society through the provision of ecosystem services.”

    From Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps (2021) · cites this paper as Lundy and Wade 2011

    The supplied passage contains only the paper’s title, authors, and publication details. Searches for ponds and their ecosystem-service contributions returned no matching passage in our copy, so it does not establish the claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lundy, L., & Wade, R.
Affiliations
  • Middlesex University London (GB)
  • Abertay University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lundy, L.
Venue
Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
Published
2011-10
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
653-669
ISSN
  • 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0296
OpenAlex
W2078693845
Cited by
190
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Abertay Research Portal (Abertay University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Abertay University
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-496-26-0048)
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Keywords
urban ecosystem services, urban water management, multifunctional landscapes, urban river restoration, transdisciplinary research, urban water bodies, urban resilience, social-ecological systems, cultural ecosystem services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review