Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraine

Hewitt, David J, Aurora, Sheena K, Dodick, David W, Goadsby, Peter J, Ge, Yang (Joy), Bachman, Robert, Taraborelli, Donna, Fan, Xiaoyin, Assaid, Christopher, Lines, Christopher, Ho, Tony W·2011·Cephalalgia

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 for acute treatment of migraine. Methods: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, two-stage adaptive study with two interim efficacy analyses to facilitate optimal dose selection. Migraine patients were initially randomized to MK-3207 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 mg or placebo to treat a moderate/severe migraine. One or more doses were to be discontinued based on the first interim analysis and a lower or higher dose could be added based on the second interim analysis. The primary endpoint was two-hour pain freedom. Results: A total of 547 patients took study medication. After the first interim analysis, the two lowest MK-3207 doses (2.5, 5 mg) were identified as showing insufficient efficacy. Per the pre-specified adaptive design decision rule, only the 2.5-mg group was discontinued and the five highest doses (5, 10, 20, 50, 100 mg) were continued into the second stage. After the second interim efficacy analysis, a 200 mg dose was added due to insufficient efficacy at the top three (20, 50, 100 mg) doses. A positive dose-response trend was demonstrated when data were combined across all MK-3207 doses for two-hour pain freedom ( p < .001). The pairwise difference versus placebo for two-hour pain freedom was significant for 200 mg ( p < .001) and nominally significant for 100 mg and 10 mg ( p < .05). The incidence of adverse events appeared comparable between active treatment groups and placebo, and did not appear to increase with increasing dose. Conclusions: MK-3207 was effective and generally well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0333102411398399

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Hewitt, D. J., Aurora, S. K., Dodick, D. W., Goadsby, P. J., Ge, Y. (., Bachman, R., Taraborelli, D., Fan, X., Assaid, C., Lines, C., & Ho, T. W.
Venue
Cephalalgia
Published
2011-03-07
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
712-722
ISSN
  • 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2982
OpenAlex
W2038399206
Cited by
263
References
0
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0333102411398399
The paper
Hewitt, D. J., Aurora, S. K., Dodick, D. W., Goadsby, P. J., Ge, Y. (., Bachman, R., Taraborelli, D., Fan, X., Assaid, C., Lines, C., & Ho, T. W. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102411398399

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.