The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraine
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 for acute treatment of migraine. Methods: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, two-stage adaptive study with two interim efficacy analyses to facilitate optimal dose selection. Migraine patients were initially randomized to MK-3207 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 mg or placebo to treat a moderate/severe migraine. One or more doses were to be discontinued based on the first interim analysis and a lower or higher dose could be added based on the second interim analysis. The primary endpoint was two-hour pain freedom. Results: A total of 547 patients took study medication. After the first interim analysis, the two lowest MK-3207 doses (2.5, 5 mg) were identified as showing insufficient efficacy. Per the pre-specified adaptive design decision rule, only the 2.5-mg group was discontinued and the five highest doses (5, 10, 20, 50, 100 mg) were continued into the second stage. After the second interim efficacy analysis, a 200 mg dose was added due to insufficient efficacy at the top three (20, 50, 100 mg) doses. A positive dose-response trend was demonstrated when data were combined across all MK-3207 doses for two-hour pain freedom ( p < .001). The pairwise difference versus placebo for two-hour pain freedom was significant for 200 mg ( p < .001) and nominally significant for 100 mg and 10 mg ( p < .05). The incidence of adverse events appeared comparable between active treatment groups and placebo, and did not appear to increase with increasing dose. Conclusions: MK-3207 was effective and generally well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Therapeutic Peptides: Current Applications and Future Directions
Wang, L., Wang, N., Zhang, W., Cheng, X., Yan, Z., Shao, G., Wang, X., Wang, R., & Fu, C. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00904-4 · Cited by 2,131
Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing
Goadsby, P. J., Holland, P. R., Martins-Oliveira, M., Hoffmann, J., Schankin, C., & Akerman, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2015 · Cited by 1,998
Self-citationCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide: Physiology and Pathophysiology
Russell, F. A., King, R., Smillie, S.-J., Kodji, X., & Brain, S. D. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2013 · Cited by 1,258
A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine
Goadsby, P. J., Reuter, U., Hallström, Y., Broessner, G., Bonner, J. H., Zhang, F., Sapra, S., Picard, H., Mikol, D. D., & Lenz, R. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1705848 · Cited by 928
Self-citationDiencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine
Akerman, S., Holland, P. R., & Goadsby, P. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3057 · Cited by 532
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hewitt, D. J., Aurora, S. K., Dodick, D. W., Goadsby, P. J., Ge, Y. (., Bachman, R., Taraborelli, D., Fan, X., Assaid, C., Lines, C., & Ho, T. W.
- Venue
- Cephalalgia
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 712-722
- ISSN
- 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2982
- OpenAlex
- W2038399206
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0333102411398399
- The paper
- Hewitt, D. J., Aurora, S. K., Dodick, D. W., Goadsby, P. J., Ge, Y. (., Bachman, R., Taraborelli, D., Fan, X., Assaid, C., Lines, C., & Ho, T. W. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102411398399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.