Cited by 47Urban Transport and AccessibilitySentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningTransportation and Mobility Innovations

Public Opinion on Dockless Bike Sharing: A Machine Learning Approach

Rahim Taleqani, Ali, Hough, Jill, Nygard, Kendall E.·2019·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

Dockless bike sharing is an emerging paradigm. Like many other technologies, it brings advantages and disadvantages to communities. Further investigation into public opinion will shed light on the impact of this technology on communities and provide input to city authorities for transportation planning. Transportation planning processes can be enhanced by engaging the community through social media technologies. Social media like Twitter, Facebook, and other microblogging media have been used for planning, but have not been extensively evaluated for that purpose. This study examined approximately 32,000 posts on Twitter to assess public opinion on dockless bike-sharing systems. Using a mix of text mining and statistical techniques, we examined relevant posts to determine the sentiment polarity of tweets, the underlying topics in the tweets, and the extent of engagement and impact on the decision-making process. Results given by two different sentiment algorithms show that there is more positive than negative polarity across the algorithms. Also, the findings show that the underlying topics in tweets include electric scooters, private e-hailing companies, and blockage of sidewalks, among others. The results indicate that the dockless shared mobility models are potentially useful in generating participation, but faced substantial technical, analytical, and communication barriers to influencing decision-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0361198119838982

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML has been applied to monitor public sentiment about bike shares via tweets.

    “ML has been applied to monitor public sentiment about such bike shares via tweets [775].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [775]

  • ML can distill information on urban issues related to climate change through web-scraping and text-mining.

    “ML can also distill information on urban issues related to climate change through web-scraping and text-mining, e.g., [775].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [775]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahim Taleqani, A., Hough, J., & Nygard, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Transportation, Logistics and Finance Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND
  • North Dakota State University (US)
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2019-04
Volume
2673
Issue
4
Pages
195-204
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W2933112115
Cited by
47
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Keywords
dockless bike-sharing, public opinion, Twitter, sentiment analysis, shared mobility, electric scooters, transportation planning, community participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review