Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 722

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion during Running after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Tashman, Scott, Collon, David, Anderson, Kyle, Kolowich, Patricia, Anderst, William·2004·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for restoring normal knee kinematics is largely unknown, particularly during sports movements generating large, rapidly applied forces. Hypothesis: Under dynamic in vivo loading, significant differences in 3-dimensional kinematics exist between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees and the contralateral, uninjured knees. Study Design: Prospective, in vivo laboratory study. Methods: Kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed and contralateral (uninjured) knees were evaluated for 6 subjects during downhill running 4 to 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using a 250 frame/s stereoradiographic system. Anatomical reference axes were determined from computed tomography scans. Kinematic differences between the uninjured and reconstructed limbs were evaluated with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Anterior tibial translation was similar for the reconstructed and uninjured limbs. However, reconstructed knees were more externally rotated on average by 3.8 ± 2.3° across all subjects and time points (P = .0011). Reconstructed knees were also more adducted, by an average of 2.8 ± 1.6° (P = .0091). Although differences were small, they were consistent in all subjects. Conclusions: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failed to restore normal rotational knee kinematics during dynamic loading. Clinical Relevance: Although further study is required, these abnormal motions may contribute to long-term joint degeneration associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury/reconstruction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546503261709

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 722

Metadata

Authors
Tashman, S., Collon, D., Anderson, K., Kolowich, P., & Anderst, W.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2004-06
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
975-983
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2134002889
Cited by
722
References
34
FWCI
21.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion during Running after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546503261709
The paper
Tashman, S., Collon, D., Anderson, K., Kolowich, P., & Anderst, W. (2004). Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion during Running after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546503261709

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.