Cited by 229Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesTendon Structure and Treatment

Effects of Applied Quadriceps and Hamstrings Muscle Loads on Forces in the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments

Markolf, Keith L., O'Neill, Geoffery, Jackson, Steven R., McAllister, David R.·2004·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Muscle contraction can subject healing knee ligament grafts to high loads. Purpose: To directly measure the effects of quadriceps and hamstrings muscle loads on forces in the anterior cruciate ligaments and posterior cruciate ligaments. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Thirteen cadaveric knee specimens had load cells installed to record resultant forces in both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments under 5 loading conditions. Cruciate force measurements were repeated with a 100-N load applied to the quadriceps tendon and again with a combined 50-N biceps load and 50-N semimembranosus-semitendinosus load. Results: Applied quadriceps loads resulted in mean changes in anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament forces that were less than 20 N for all loading conditions. Hamstrings load significantly increased mean posterior cruciate ligament force between 30° and 105° of flexion with 100 N of applied posterior tibial force. Conclusions: At the muscle force levels used in this study, the hamstrings were more effective than the quadriceps in altering cruciate force levels, especially near 90° of flexion, where they have an excellent mechanical advantage for controlling anterior-posterior tibial translation. Clinical Relevance: Isolated hamstrings activity generally had little or no effect on anterior cruciate ligament forces but significantly increased forces in the posterior cruciate ligament beyond approximately 30° of flexion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546503262198

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Markolf, K. L., O'Neill, G., Jackson, S. R., & McAllister, D. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2004-07
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
1144-1149
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2118040773
Cited by
229
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, knee flexion angle, tibial translation, ligament healing
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cadaver, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Tendons, Range of Motion, Articular, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Weight-Bearing, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review