Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Varying Femoral Tunnels between the Anatomical Footprint and Isometric Positions: Effect on Kinematics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee

Musahl, Volker, Plakseychuk, Anton, Vanscyoc, Andrew, Sasaki, Tomoyuki, Debski, Richard E., Mcmahon, Patrick J., Fu, Freddie H.·2005·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Knee kinematics and in situ forces resulting from anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with 2 femoral tunnel positions were evaluated. Hypothesis: A graft placed inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament will restore knee function better than a graft placed at a position for best graft isometry. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knees were tested in response to a 134-N anterior load and a combined 10-N·m valgus and 5-N·m internal rotation load. A robotic universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to apply loads, and resulting kinematics were recorded. An active surgical robot system was used for positioning tunnels in 2 locations in the femoral notch: inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament and a position for best graft isometry. The same quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was used for both tunnel positions. The 2 loading conditions were applied. Results: At 30° of knee flexion, anterior tibial translation in response to the anterior load for the intact knee was 9.8 ± 3.1 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 13.8 ± 4.6 mm; position 2: 16.6 ± 3.7 mm; P <. 05). There was a significant difference between the 2 tunnel positions. At the same flexion angle, the anterior tibial translation in response to the combined load for the intact knee was 7.7 ± 4.0 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 10.4 ± 5.5 mm; position 2: 12.0 ± 5.2 mm; P <. 05), with a significant difference between the tunnel positions. Conclusion: Neither femoral tunnel position restores normal kinematics of the intact knee. A femoral tunnel position inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament results in knee kinematics closer to the intact knee than does a tunnel position located for best graft isometry. Clinical Relevance: Anatomical femoral tunnel position is important in reproducing function of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546504271747

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Musahl, V., Plakseychuk, A., Vanscyoc, A., Sasaki, T., Debski, R. E., Mcmahon, P. J., & Fu, F. H.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2005-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
712-718
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2134630947
Cited by
331
References
23
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Varying Femoral Tunnels between the Anatomical Footprint and Isometric Positions: Effect on Kinematics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546504271747
The paper
Musahl, V., Plakseychuk, A., Vanscyoc, A., Sasaki, T., Debski, R. E., Mcmahon, P. J., & Fu, F. H. (2005). Varying Femoral Tunnels between the Anatomical Footprint and Isometric Positions: Effect on Kinematics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504271747

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.