Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form

Irrgang, James J., Anderson, Allen F., Boland, Arthur L., Harner, Christopher D., Neyret, Philippe, Richmond, John C., Shelbourne, K. Donald, International Knee Documentation Committee·2006·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form was developed to measure change in symptoms, function, and sports activity in patients treated for a variety of knee conditions. Although previous research has demonstrated reliability and validity of the form, its responsiveness has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients who participated in the original validation study for the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form completed the form and a 7-level global rating of change scale that ranged from greatly worse to greatly better after a mean of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-2.3 years). Analyses included calculation of the standardized response mean and mean change in International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score compared to the patient's perception of change on the global rating of change scale. In addition, a receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the change in score that best distinguished patients who improved from those who did not. Results: The overall standardized response mean was 0.94, which is considered large. With the exception of those who were slightly worse or unchanged, the mean change in the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score compared to the patients’ perceived global ratings of change was as expected (greatly worse,–15.1; somewhat worse,–8.4; slightly worse, 20.6; no change, 10.7; slightly better, 5.9; somewhat better, 18.1; greatly better, 38.7). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a change score of 11.5 points had the highest sensitivity, and a change score of 20.5 points had the highest specificity to distinguish between those who were or were not improved. Conclusion: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form is a responsive measure of symptoms, function, and sports activity for patients with a variety of knee conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546506288855

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., Harner, C. D., Neyret, P., Richmond, J. C., Shelbourne, K. D., & International Knee Documentation Committee
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2006-10
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
1567-1573
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2100375466
Cited by
461
References
17
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546506288855
The paper
Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., Harner, C. D., Neyret, P., Richmond, J. C., Shelbourne, K. D., & International Knee Documentation Committee. (2006). Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506288855

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.