The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form was developed to measure change in symptoms, function, and sports activity in patients treated for a variety of knee conditions. Although previous research has demonstrated reliability and validity of the form, its responsiveness has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients who participated in the original validation study for the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form completed the form and a 7-level global rating of change scale that ranged from greatly worse to greatly better after a mean of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-2.3 years). Analyses included calculation of the standardized response mean and mean change in International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score compared to the patient's perception of change on the global rating of change scale. In addition, a receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the change in score that best distinguished patients who improved from those who did not. Results: The overall standardized response mean was 0.94, which is considered large. With the exception of those who were slightly worse or unchanged, the mean change in the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score compared to the patients’ perceived global ratings of change was as expected (greatly worse,–15.1; somewhat worse,–8.4; slightly worse, 20.6; no change, 10.7; slightly better, 5.9; somewhat better, 18.1; greatly better, 38.7). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a change score of 11.5 points had the highest sensitivity, and a change score of 20.5 points had the highest specificity to distinguish between those who were or were not improved. Conclusion: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form is a responsive measure of symptoms, function, and sports activity for patients with a variety of knee conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-825_9 · Cited by 3,476
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form
Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., Harner, C. D., Kurosaka, M., Neyret, P., Richmond, J. C., & Shelborne, K. D. (2001) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465010290051301 · Cited by 2,204
Self-citationMeasuring the whole or the parts?
Beaton, D. E., Katz, J. N., Fossel, A. H., Wright, J. G., Tarasuk, V., & Bombardier, C. (2001) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80043-0 · Cited by 1,306
Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation
Liang, M. H., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G. (1990) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008 · Cited by 914
Deyo, R. A., & Centor, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(86)90038-x · Cited by 792
Development of a Patient-Reported Measure of Function of the Knee*
IRRGANG, J. J., SNYDER-MACKLER, L., WAINNER, R. S., FU, F. H., & HARNER, C. D. (1998) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199808000-00006 · Cited by 637
Self-citationA method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index
Christensen, L., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(86)80060-0 · Cited by 508
Cited by
Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Kruse, L. M., Gray, B., & Wright, R. W. (2012) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.k.01246 · Cited by 323
Lentz, T. A., Zeppieri, G., George, S. Z., Tillman, S. M., Moser, M. W., Farmer, K. W., & Chmielewski, T. L. (2015) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546514559707 · Cited by 297
Filardo, G., Previtali, D., Napoli, F., Candrian, C., Zaffagnini, S., & Grassi, A. (2021) · CARTILAGE · doi:10.1177/1947603520931170 · Cited by 294
The MARS Group, Wright, R. W., Huston, L. J., Haas, A. K., Spindler, K. P., Nwosu, S. K., Allen, C. R., Anderson, A. F., Cooper, D. E., DeBerardino, T. M., et al. (2014) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546514549005 · Cited by 280
Self-citationLower Extremity-Specific Measures of Disability and Outcomes in Orthopaedic Surgery
Smith, M. V., Klein, S. E., Clohisy, J. C., Baca, G. R., Brophy, R. H., & Wright, R. W. (2012) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.01822 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., Harner, C. D., Neyret, P., Richmond, J. C., Shelbourne, K. D., & International Knee Documentation Committee
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1567-1573
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2100375466
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546506288855
- The paper
- Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., Harner, C. D., Neyret, P., Richmond, J. C., Shelbourne, K. D., & International Knee Documentation Committee. (2006). Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506288855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.