The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: After reinsertion on the humerus, the rotator cuff has limited ability to heal. Growth factor augmentation has been proposed to enhance healing in such procedure. Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of growth factor augmentation during rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Eighty-eight patients with a rotator cuff tear were randomly assigned by a computer-generated sequence to receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without (n = 45) or with (n = 43) augmentation with autologous platelet-rich fibrin matrix (PRFM). The primary end point was the postoperative difference in the Constant score between the 2 groups. The secondary end point was the integrity of the repaired rotator cuff, as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: All the patients completed follow-up at 16 months. There was no statistically significant difference in total Constant score when comparing the results of arthroscopic repair of the 2 groups (95% confidence interval, −3.43 to 3.9) ( P = .44). There was no statistically significant difference in magnetic resonance imaging tendon score when comparing arthroscopic repair with or without PRFM ( P = .07). Conclusion: Our study does not support the use of autologous PRFM for augmentation of a double-row repair of a small or medium rotator cuff tear to improve the healing of the rotator cuff. Our results are applicable to small and medium rotator cuff tears; it is possible that PRFM may be beneficial for large and massive rotator cuff tears. Also, given the heterogeneity of PRFM preparation products available on the market, it is possible that other preparations may be more effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chahla, J., Cinque, M. E., Piuzzi, N. S., Mannava, S., Geeslin, A. G., Murray, I. R., Dornan, G. J., Muschler, G. F., & LaPrade, R. F. (2017) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.16.01374 · Cited by 504
Mishra, A. K., Skrepnik, N. V., Edwards, S. G., Jones, G. L., Sampson, S., Vermillion, D. A., Ramsey, M. L., Karli, D. C., & Rettig, A. C. (2014) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546513494359 · Cited by 396
de Jonge, S., de Vos, R. J., Weir, A., van Schie, H. T. M., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A., Verhaar, J. A. N., Weinans, H., & Tol, J. L. (2011) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546511404877 · Cited by 371
Rodeo, S. A., Delos, D., Williams, R. J., Adler, R. S., Pearle, A., & Warren, R. F. (2012) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546512442924 · Cited by 344
Chen, X., Jones, I. A., Park, C., & Vangsness, C. T. (2018) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546517743746 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Castricini, R., Longo, U. G., De Benedetto, M., Panfoli, N., Pirani, P., Zini, R., Maffulli, N., & Denaro, V.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-12-15
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 258-265
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2084041307
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546510390780
- The paper
- Castricini, R., Longo, U. G., De Benedetto, M., Panfoli, N., Pirani, P., Zini, R., Maffulli, N., & Denaro, V. (2011). Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510390780
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.