CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 367Tendon Structure and TreatmentKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesSports injuries and prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medial collateral ligament healing: A multidisciplinary assessment in rabbits

Frank, C., Woo, S.L.-Y., Amiel, D., Harwood, F., Gomez, M., Akeson, W.·1983·The American Journal of Sports Medicine
DOI 10.1177/036354658301100602
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Medial collateral ligament healing without treatment has been studied in a rabbit model. Complete midsubstance gaps were found to heal by distinct scar formation over time. This healing process was fast since the gap was bridged quickly; however, more subtle changes in ap pearance of the healing tissue continued for many months. The ligament "scar" was found to be structur ally abnormal chemically and mechanically even at long- term followup. A plateau in its improvement suggests that the scar may never approach normal ligament characteristics (without treatment). A baseline of liga ment healing by scar formation has been established.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/036354658301100602

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Grillo HC Aspects of the ongin, synthesis and evaluation of fibrous tissue in repair In Montagna W, Billingham RE (ed) Advances in Biology of Skin, Wound Healing , New York, Pergamon Press, 1964, pp 128-143
  2. Madden JW Wound healing Biologic and clinical features. In Sabiston DC (ed): Textbook of Surgery-The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice Philadelphia , WB Saunders, 1972, p 262
  3. Peacock EE Jr, Van Winkle W. Jr The biochemistry and the environment of wounds and their relation to wound strength In Peacock EE, Van Winkle W (ed) Surgery and Biology of Wound Repair Philadelphia, WB Saunders , 1970, pp 129-130

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 367

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Frank, C., Woo, S. L.-Y., Amiel, D., Harwood, F., Gomez, M., & Akeson, W.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
ORCID
Amiel, D.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1983-11
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
379-389
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
DOI
10.1177/036354658301100602
OpenAlex
W2052694074
Cited by
367
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
medial collateral ligament, ligament healing, scar formation, rabbit model, ligament biomechanics
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Body Water, Cicatrix, Collagen, DNA, Glycosaminoglycans, Knee Joint, Ligaments, Articular, Male, Rabbits, Wound Healing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review