The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of the medial collateral ligament injury: II: Structure and function of canine knees in response to differing treatment regimens
Abstract
In order to assess the healing of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and to detect the various effects of treatment regimens, in vivo animal experiments using a canine model were performed. Thirty-five canine MCLs were surgically transected and treated using three clinically popular regimens, e.g., no repair with cage and farm activities (Group 1), repair with 3 weeks immobilization (Group 2), and repair with 6 weeks im mobilization (Group 3). The varus-valgus laxity of the knee joint, structural properties of the femur-MCL-tibia (FMT) complex and the mechanical properties of the MCL substance (healing site) were quantitatively meas ured at 6, 12, and 48 weeks postoperatively. It was found that Group 1 animals had the best results. The varus-valgus laxity of the knee joint and the structural properties of the FMT complex returned to values comparable with the contralateral control by 12 weeks. The recovery of the mechanical properties of the MCL substance was slower and not complete, even at 48 weeks. In confirmation with previous studies, prolonged immobilization was shown to have deleterious effects on MCL healing. The results of this study indicated that early mobilization is the treatment of choice in cases of isolated MCL injury. Also, this study emphasized the importance and effectiveness of using various biome chanical parameters in addition to the conventional ultimate values at failure to evaluate the progress of soft tissue repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Medial collateral ligament healing: A multidisciplinary assessment in rabbits
Frank, C., Woo, S. L.-Y., Amiel, D., Harwood, F., Gomez, M., & Akeson, W. (1983) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354658301100602 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Cited by
Injury and repair of the musculoskeletal soft tissues. Savannah, Georgia, June 18–20, 1987
Woo, S. L., & Buckwalter, J. A. (1988) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100060615 · Cited by 141
Self-citationManagement of Medial-Sided Knee Injuries, Part 1: Medial Collateral Ligament
Marchant, M. H., Tibor, L. M., Sekiya, J. K., Hardaker, W. T., Garrett, W. E., & Taylor, D. C. (2011) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546510385999 · Cited by 124
Effect of Growth Factors on the Proliferation of Ligament Fibroblasts from Skeletally Mature Rabbits
Scherping, S. C., Schmidt, C. C., Georgescu, H. I., Kwoh, C. K., Evans, C. H., & Woo, S. L.-Y. (1997) · Connective Tissue Research · doi:10.3109/03008209709160209 · Cited by 124
Self-citationCollagen fibril diameters in the healing adult rabbit medial collateral ligament
Frank, C., McDonald, D., Bray, D., Bray, R., Rangayyan, R., Chimich, D., & Shrive, N. (1992) · Connective Tissue Research · doi:10.3109/03008209209007000 · Cited by 123
Mifune, Y., Matsumoto, T., Ota, S., Nishimori, M., Usas, A., Kopf, S., Kuroda, R., Kurosaka, M., Fu, F. H., & Huard, J. (2012) · Cell Transplantation · doi:10.3727/096368912x647234 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Woo, S. L.-Y., Inoue, M., McGurk-Burleson, E., & Gomez, M. A.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-29
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W1964909203
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.