The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Abstract
Different surgical methods of graft fixation in ACL re construction were examined to determine the effects on mechanical properties of the reconstructed ACL. Ten human cadavers were used in this study. Six different types of grafts were studied. The tendon grafts were removed from each cadaver and fixed to femurs and tibias as ACL substitutes with different surgical fixation methods, leaving femur-reconstructed graft- tibia preparations. The surgical techniques used were staple fixation, tying sutures over buttons, and screw fixation. In the latter, the screws were introduced through femoral and tibial drill holes from the outside in order to achieve interference fit as described by Lam bert. Tensile testing demonstrated that the original ACL is significantly stronger than the graft used for recon struction in linear load, stiffness, and maximum tensile strength. All of the failures of the reconstructed ACL grafts occurred at the fixation site, indicating that the mechanically weak link of the reconstructed graft is located at the fixation site. Among the different meth ods of fixation, one-third of the patellar tendon secured with a cancellous screw, especially with a custom de signed large diameter screw, showed significantly higher values. Although many other factors affect the success of ACL reconstruction, our study indicates that the method of surgical fixation is the major factor influencing the graft's mechanical properties in the im mediate postoperative period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aglietti, P., Buzzi, R., Zaccherotti, G., & De Biase, P. (1994) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354659402200210 · Cited by 503
Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Corry, I. S., Webb, J. M., Clingeleffer, A. J., & Pinczewski, L. A. (1999) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465990270040701 · Cited by 462
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation: Comparison of Hamstring and Patellar Tendon Grafts
Steiner, M. E., Hecker, A. T., Brown, C. H., & Hayes, W. C. (1994) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354659402200215 · Cited by 398
Preliminary results of an absorbable interference screw
Barber, F. A., Elrod, B. F., McGuire, D. A., & Paulos, L. E. (1995) · Arthroscopy · doi:10.1016/0749-8063(95)90129-9 · Cited by 178
Analysis of a Semitendinosus Autograft in a Rabbit Model
Blickenstaff, K. R., Grana, W. A., & Egle, D. (1997) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354659702500420 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurosaka, M., Yoshiya, S., & Andrish, J. T.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-229
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2107746235
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/036354658701500306
- The paper
- Kurosaka, M., Yoshiya, S., & Andrish, J. T. (1987). A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658701500306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.