Cited by 27Intestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsMesenchymal stem cell researchTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Stem cells for mesothelial repair: an understudied modality

Lucas, P.A.·2007·The International Journal of Artificial Organs

Abstract

Adhesions are bands of fibrous tissue that form between opposing organs and the peritoneum, restricting vital intrapleural and abdominal movement. They remain a major problem in abdominal surgery, occurring in more than three fourths of patients following laparotomy. Adhesions result when injury to the mesothelium is not repaired by mesothelial cells and can be viewed as scar tissue formation. The mechanism of mesothelial healing suggested the involvement of stem cells in the process. It has long been known that peritoneal wounds heal in the same amount of time regardless of size. Therefore, the mesothelium could not regenerate solely by proliferation and centripetal migration of cells at the wound edge as occurs in the healing of skin epithelium. Several studies suggest the presence of i) mesothelial stem cells that can differentiate into mesothelial cells and a few other phenotypes and/or ii) that mesothelial cells are themselves stem cells. Other studies have suggested that adult stem cells in the muscle underlying the peritoneum can differentiate into mesothelial cells and contribute to healing. Prevention of abdominal adhesions have been accomplished by delivery of autologous mesothelial cells and multipotent adult stem cells isolated from skeletal muscle. Adult stem cells from sources other than the serosal tissue offer an alternative treatment modality to prevent the formation of abdominal adhesions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/039139880703000613

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some mesenchymal/mesothelial cells of the peritoneal cavity, of mesothelial repair after surgery, and in endometrium and endometriosis are directly derived from bone marrow.

    “Some of these mesenchymal/ mesothelial cells of the peritoneal cavity (48), of the mesothelial repair after surgery (126) and in endometrium and endometriosis (127-131) are directly derived from bone marrow.”

    From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [126]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucas, P. A.
Affiliations
New York Medical College (US)
Corresponding author
Lucas, P.A.
Venue
The International Journal of Artificial Organs
Published
2007-06
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
550-556
ISSN
  • 0391-3988 (ISSN-L)
  • 1724-6040
OpenAlex
W2343543857
Cited by
27
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Artificial Organs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
peritoneal adhesions, mesothelial cells, skeletal muscle-derived stem cells, adhesion prevention, laparotomy
MeSH terms
Tissue Adhesions, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Epithelium, Humans, Postoperative Complications, Regeneration, Tissue Engineering, Stem Cell Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review