The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validity and Utility in a Memory Clinic Setting
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To prospectively validate the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a UK memory clinic. Method: We administered the MoCA and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to 32 subjects fulfilling diagnostic criteria for dementia, to 23 subjects fulfilling diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and to 12 memory clinic comparison subjects, at baseline and then at 6-month follow-up. Clinical diagnoses for dementia and MCI were made according to ICD-10 and Petersen criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of both measures were assessed for detection of MCI and dementia. Results: With a cut-off score of 26, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 17% to detect subjects with MCI, whereas the MoCA detected 83%. The MMSE had a sensitivity of 25% to detect subjects with dementia, whereas the MoCA detected 94%. Specificity for the MMSE was 100%, and specificity for the MoCA was 50%. Of subjects with MCI, 35% developed dementia within 6 months, and all scored less than 26 points on the MoCA at baseline. Conclusions: The MoCA is a useful brief screening tool for the detection of mild dementia or MCI in subjects scoring over 25 points on the MMSE. In patients already diagnosed with MCI, the MoCA helps identify those at risk of developing dementia at 6-month follow-up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
The Mini‐Mental State Examination: A Comprehensive Review
Tombaugh, T. N., & McIntyre, N. J. (1992) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x · Cited by 5,152
Roth, M., Tym, E., Mountjoy, C. Q., Huppert, F. A., Hendrie, H., Verma, S., & Goddard, R. (1986) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.149.6.698 · Cited by 2,090
Modrego, P. J., Fayed, N., & Pina, M. A. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.667 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Assessing cognitive decline in the aging brain: lessons from rodent and human studies
Brito, D. V. C., Esteves, F., Rajado, A. T., Silva, N., ALFA score Consortium, Andrade, R., Apolónio, J., Calado, S., Faleiro, L., Matos, C., et al. (2023) · npj Aging · doi:10.1038/s41514-023-00120-6 · Cited by 177
Risk factors associated with severe hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes
Weinstock, R. S., DuBose, S. N., Bergenstal, R. M., Chaytor, N. S., Peterson, C., Olson, B. A., Munshi, M. N., Perrin, A. J. S., Miller, K. M., Beck, R. W., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-1426 · Cited by 171
Zygouris, S., Giakoumis, D., Votis, K., Doumpoulakis, S., Ntovas, K., Segkouli, S., Karagiannidis, C., Tzovaras, D., & Tsolaki, M. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-141260 · Cited by 158
Suridjan, I., Pollock, B. G., Verhoeff, N. P. L. G., Voineskos, A. N., Chow, T., Rusjan, P. M., Lobaugh, N. J., Houle, S., Mulsant, B. H., & Mizrahi, R. (2015) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2015.1 · Cited by 132
Berg, J.-L., Durant, J., Léger, G. C., Cummings, J. L., Nasreddine, Z., & Miller, J. B. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-170896 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, T., Gildeh, N., & Holmes, C.
- Venue
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 329-332
- ISSN
- 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
- 1497-0015
- OpenAlex
- W2124106549
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
