Cited by 58Migration, Health and TraumaMental Health Treatment and AccessMigration, Identity, and Health

Mental health status, health care utilisation, and service satisfaction among immigrants in Montreal: An epidemiological comparison

Open access
Whitley, Rob, Wang, JiaWei, Fleury, Marie-Josee, Liu, Aihua, Caron, Jean·2017·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine variations between immigrants and nonimmigrants in 1) prevalence of common mental disorders and other mental health variables; 2) health service utilisation for emotional problems, mental disorders, and addictions, and 3) health service satisfaction. METHODS: This article is based on a longitudinal cohort study conducted from May 2007 to the present: the Epidemiological Catchment Area Study of Montreal South-West (ZEPSOM). Participants were followed up at 4 time points (T1, n = 2433; T4, n = 1095). Core exposure variables include immigrant status (immigrant vs. nonimmigrant), duration of residence, and region of origin. Key outcome variables included mental health status, health service utilisation, and health service satisfaction. Data were analysed both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. RESULTS: Immigrants had been in Canada for 20 years on average. Immigrants had significantly lower rates of high psychological distress (32.6% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.016), alcohol dependence (1.4% vs. 3.9%, P =0.010), depression (5.2% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.008), and various other mental disorders. They had significantly higher scores of mental well-being (48.9 vs. 47.1 score, P = 0.014) and satisfaction with social (34.0 vs. 33.4 score, P = 0.021) and personal relationships (16.7 vs. 15.6 score, P < 0.001). Immigrants had significantly lower rates of health service utilisation for emotional problems, mental disorders, and addictions and significantly higher rates of health service satisfaction at all time points. Asian and African immigrants had particularly low rates of utilisation and high rates of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrants had better overall mental health than nonimmigrants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0706743716677724

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lower EOHCS-Episodic scores among people who have English as their first language may be explained in part by research showing that newcomers whose first language is not English tend to rate their satisfaction with care highly, reflecting appreciation for access to care that may be less accessible in their countries of origin.

    “The lower scores among people who have English as their first language may be explained, in part, by research showing that newcomers whose first language is not English tend to rate their satisfaction with care quite highly, reflecting some peoples’ appreciation for access to care that may be less accessible in their countries of origin [81–84].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [49]49. Caron J, Mercier C, Tempier R. Validation of satisfaction with Life Domains Scale in Quebec [in French]. Sante Ment Que. 1997;22(2):195-217.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitley, R., Wang, J., Fleury, M.-J., Liu, A., & Caron, J.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
Corresponding author
Whitley, Rob
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-11-12
Volume
62
Issue
8
Pages
570-579
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2551517919
Cited by
58
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (79839_1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Identity, and Health
Keywords
immigrants, mental health, health care utilization, health service satisfaction, psychological distress, depression, alcoholism, mental illness, psychological well-being, duration of residence, region of origin, Asian immigrants, African immigrants, Montreal
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quebec, Prevalence, Patient Satisfaction, Emigrants and Immigrants, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review