Cited by 355Social Media in Health EducationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityMisinformation and Its Impacts

TikTok and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study of Social Media Content Quality

Open access
Yeung, Anthony, Ng, Enoch, Abi-Jaoude, Elia·2022·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: Social media platforms are increasingly being used to disseminate mental health information online. User-generated content about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most popular health topics on the video-sharing social media platform TikTok. We sought to investigate the quality of TikTok videos about ADHD. Method: The top 100 most popular videos about ADHD uploaded by TikTok video creators were classified as misleading, useful, or personal experience. Descriptive and quantitative characteristics of the videos were obtained. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V) and Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used to assess the overall quality, understandability, and actionability of the videos. Results: Of the 100 videos meeting inclusion criteria, 52% ( n = 52) were classified as misleading, 27% ( n = 27) as personal experience, and 21% ( n = 21) as useful. Classification agreement between clinician ratings was 86% (kappa statistic of 0.7766). Videos on the platform were highly understandable by viewers but had low actionability. Non-healthcare providers uploaded the majority of misleading videos. Healthcare providers uploaded higher quality and more useful videos, compared to non-healthcare providers. Conclusions: Approximately half of the analyzed TikTok videos about ADHD were misleading. Clinicians should be aware of the widespread dissemination of health misinformation on social media platforms and its potential impact on clinical care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07067437221082854

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many accounts describing users with conditions such as eating disorders, Tourette's Syndrome, Dissociative Identity Disorder, ADHD, and borderline personality disorder received millions of views on TikTok.

    “Notably, many accounts describing the journeys of users with conditions such as eating disorders (ED), Tourette’s Syndrome, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and borderline personality disorder received millions of views [40–43].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Kostygina G Tran H Binns S, et al. Boosting health campaign reach and engagement through use of social media influencers and memes. Social Media+Society. 2020; 6(2): 2056305120912475.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeung, A., Ng, E., & Abi-Jaoude, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Toronto
Corresponding author
Yeung, Anthony
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2022-02-23
Volume
67
Issue
12
Pages
899-906
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W4213417183
Cited by
355
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
48.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
TikTok, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, health misinformation, social media health information, video quality, PEMAT-A/V, JAMA benchmark criteria, user-generated content
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, United States, Video Recording, Information Dissemination, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review