Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kapi Wiya : Water insecurity and aqua-nullius in remote inland Aboriginal Australia

Judd, Barry·2019·Thesis Eleven

Abstract

Water has been a critical resource for Anangu peoples across the remote inland for millennia, underpinning their ability to live in low rainfall environments. Anangu biocultural knowledge of kapi (water) developed in complex ways that enabled this resource to be found. Such biocultural knowledge included deep understandings of weather patterns and of species behavior. Kapi and its significance to desert-dwelling peoples can be seen in ancient mapping practices, whether embedded in stone as petroglyphs or in ceremonial song and dance practices associated with the Tjukurpa. While in the past the sustainability of kapi was facilitated by mobility that spread human dependence on this resource across multiple sites, since the 1940s Anangu have been coerced by the settler-colonial state to live a sedentary lifestyle in remote communities such as Haasts Bluff, Papunya and Yuendemu. In many of these communities the supply of kapi is becoming increasingly insecure in terms of viability of supply, cost, quality and threats from mining. This paper provides a brief insight into how kapi has become devalued in the context of contemporary remote communities with particular reference to my area of expertise – Aboriginal identity, well-being and Australian sports.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0725513618821969

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bergmann A, Weber FA, Meiners HG, (2014) Potential water-related environmental risks of hydraulic fracturing employed in exploration and exploitation of unconventional natural gas reservoirs in Germany. Environmental Sciences Europe 26: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-26-10 · DOI
  2. Butcher T, 2016, Griffith Review, 53, 167
  3. 10.1071/9781486306121 · DOI
  4. Judd B, 2017, ‘And There’ll Be NO Dancing’: Perspectives on Policies Impacting Indigenous Australia since, 2007
  5. 10.5325/aboriginal.1.2.0214 · DOI
  6. Judd B, 2016, Australian Aboriginal Studies, 1, 68
  7. 10.1002/j.1834-4461.1976.tb01254.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.22459/NDLA.09.2017.19 · DOI
  9. Marshall V, 2017, Overturning Aqua Nullius: Securing Aboriginal Water Rights
  10. McKenzie C, 2003, Mr
  11. Nettelbeck A, 2007, In the Name of the Law: William Willshire and the Policing of the Australian Frontier
  12. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01757.x · DOI
  13. Saunders PJ, McCoy D, Goldstein R, (2018) A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development. Environ Geochem Health 40: 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-016-9898-x. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Judd, B.
Affiliations
Charles Darwin University and University of Western Australia, Australia
Venue
Thesis Eleven
Published
2019-01-14
Volume
150
Issue
1
Pages
102-118
ISSN
  • 0725-5136
  • 1461-7455
Cited by
6
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review