The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Unanticipated Consequences of Modern Social Control in Organizations
Abstract
The authors integrate research on the causes and consequences of sexual harassment victimization with organizational research to better understand the relationship between harassment and the work outcomes of job satisfaction, job stress, and intention to quit an organization. In doing so, the authors broaden the narrow conceptualization of organizational context that has been considered in previous research on sexual harassment. This broadened conceptualization incorporates features of modern organizational structure, including social integration, structural differentiation, decentralization, and formalization—all argued to indirectly control employees by increasing employee job satisfaction and commitment (and to ultimately increase productivity and reduce turnover). Although these features of modern organizational structure are not intended to reduce sexual harassment, the authors propose and find with a national sample of almost 6,000 employees that they have the unintended consequence of doing so. The authors also propose and find that this context-harassment linkage improves understanding of the often reported relationship between sexual harassment and job dissatisfaction, job stress, and intention to quit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination
Taub, N., & MacKinnon, C. A. (1980) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1122289 · Cited by 644 · cited 1×
“An alternative explanation for the relationships between age, marital status, and sexual harassment suggests that young, single women simply lack power and that sexual harassment is an expression of male power over these vulnerable and powerless women (see MacKinnon, 1979).”
BackgroundGender, Legitimate Authority, and Leader-Subordinate Conversations
Johnson, C. (1994) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096136 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Sexual Harassment, Workplace Authority, and the Paradox of Power
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412451728 · Cited by 538
Epidemiology of Psychological Distress
Drapeau, A., Marchand, A., & Beaulieu-Prevost, D. (2012) · Mental Illnesses - Understanding, Prediction and Control · doi:10.5772/30872 · Cited by 472
Chan, D. K.-S., Chow, S. Y., Lam, C. B., & Cheung, S. F. (2008) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x · Cited by 321
Behrens, A., Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/378647 · Cited by 290
Stereotype threat in organizations: implications for equity and performance
Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- MUELLER, C. W., DE COSTER, S., & ESTES, S. B.
- Venue
- Work and Occupations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 411-446
- ISSN
- 0093-9285 (ISSN-L)
- 0730-8884
- 1552-8464
- OpenAlex
- W1985308858
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Unanticipated Consequences of Modern Social Control in Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0730888401028004003
- The paper
- MUELLER, C. W., DE COSTER, S., & ESTES, S. B. (2001). Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Unanticipated Consequences of Modern Social Control in Organizations. Work and Occupations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888401028004003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.