Cited by 184Social and Intergroup PsychologyGender Diversity and InequalityCareer Development and Diversity

Stereotype threat in organizations: implications for equity and performance

Walton, Gregory M., Murphy, Mary C., Ryan, Ann Marie·2015·Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, a large body of laboratory and field research has shown that, when people perform in settings in which their group is negatively stereotyped, they may experience a phenomenon called stereotype threat that can undermine motivation and trust and cause underperformance. This review describes that research and places it into an organizational context. First, we describe the processes by which stereotype threat can impair outcomes among people in the workplace. Next, we delineate the situational cues in organizational settings that can exacerbate stereotype threat, and explain how and why these cues affect stereotyped individuals. Finally, we discuss relatively simple empirically based strategies that organizations can implement to reduce stereotype threat and create conditions in which employees and applicants from all groups can succeed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322

Cites

199 of 199 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other social identities can be devalued in leadership contexts.

    “Although the focus of this article is on gender, there are other social identities that can be devalued in leadership contexts (Sanchez-Hucles & Davis, 2010;Walton, Murphy, & Ryan, 2015).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Walton, Murphy, & Ryan, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., & Ryan, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Walton, Gregory M.
Venue
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
523-550
ISSN
  • 2327-0608 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-0616
OpenAlex
W2147668469
Cited by
184
References
199
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
stereotype threat, occupational stereotypes, underperformance, motivation, trust, situational cues, equity, performance, personnel selection, applicant selection, organizational diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review