The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment: Influences of Work Positions and Family Roles
Abstract
Data obtained from the 1991 “Work Organizations” module of the General Social Survey (GSS) reveal a small but significant tendency for employed men to display higher organizational commitment (OC) than employed women do. This article examines the gender differences and factors that arguably heighten or dampen it. The authors consider both job models highlighting gender differences on job attributes such as autonomy or rewards, and gender models that stress socialization, family ties, and differential labor market opportunities. They find that the primary explanation for the gender difference is that men are more likely than women to hold jobs with commitment-enhancing features. Gender differences in family ties do little to affect male-female OC difference. When job attributes, career variables, and family ties are simultaneously controlled, the authors find that, if anything, women tend to exhibit slightly greater OC. Contrary to implications of some gender models, the correlates of OC do not appear to be appreciably different for men and women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781412984522 · Cited by 1,797
An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data
Berk, R. A. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095230 · Cited by 1,213
Models for Sample Selection Bias
Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1992) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001551 · Cited by 812
Cited by
A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes
Reskin, B. F., & Bielby, D. D. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330053148010 · Cited by 275
Generations at work: are there differences and do they matter?
Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2011) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.573966 · Cited by 260
Reactions of Older Employees to Organizational Downsizing: The Role of Gender, Job Level, and Time
Armstrong-Stassen, M. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/56.4.p234 · Cited by 49
Chambel, M. J., Sobral, F., Espada, M., & Curral, L. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2013.849246 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- MARSDEN, P. V., KALLEBERG, A. L., & COOK, C. R.
- Venue
- Work and Occupations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 368-390
- ISSN
- 0093-9285 (ISSN-L)
- 0730-8884
- 1552-8464
- OpenAlex
- W2106196873
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment: Influences of Work Positions and Family Roles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0730888493020003005
- The paper
- MARSDEN, P. V., KALLEBERG, A. L., & COOK, C. R. (1993). Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment: Influences of Work Positions and Family Roles. Work and Occupations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888493020003005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.