Cited by 69Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderEducation Discipline and InequalityBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The Stigma of ADHD: Teacher Ratings of Labeled Students

Metzger, Ashley N., Hamilton, Laura T.·2021·Sociological Perspectives

Abstract

Despite the increasing prevalence of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), little sociological research has focused on effects of diagnosis in schools. This study, which is grounded in the modified labeling approach, relies on three waves of Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS-K:2011) data to determine if teachers evaluate the academic performance of ADHD students as less promising than non-diagnosed peers. Results indicate that teachers are more likely to rate ADHD students as performing below grade level and are less likely to acknowledge these students as performing above grade level—regardless of demonstrated ability on subject-specific tests. The latter finding is, in part, a function of real and/or perceived behaviors in the classroom that inform teachers’ grade-level performance ratings. We argue that diagnosis may be a double-edged sword for children and their families, as it can provide access to special resources in the school but may activate teachers’ negative stereotypes about diagnosed students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0731121420937739

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stigma associated with disclosure can lead many students to suffer in silence.

    “However, the stigma associated with disclosure [54] can lead many students to suffer in silence.”
  • Across HCI studies, there is a tendency to design systems that address perceived neurodivergent behaviours from an external viewpoint without adequately considering internal struggles.

    “Across a number of studies [9, 29, 30, 39, 54, 55, 64, 74, 81, 90, 93], there is a noticeable tendency to design systems that address perceived neurodivergent behaviours, often from an external viewpoint, without adequately considering the internal struggles experienced by neurodivergent individuals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Metzger, A. N., & Hamilton, L. T.
Affiliations
University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
Metzger, Ashley N.
Venue
Sociological Perspectives
Published
2020-07-15
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
258-279
ISSN
  • 0731-1214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8673
OpenAlex
W3043292142
Cited by
69
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, teacher ratings, academic performance, diagnostic labeling, stigma, teacher stereotypes, classroom behavior, special education resources, Early Childhood Longitudinal Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review