Cited by 268Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychology and Mental Health

Public knowledge and assessment of child mental health problems: findings from the national stigma study-children

PESCOSOLIDO, BERNICE A., JENSEN, PETER S., MARTIN, JACK K., PERRY, BREA L., OLAFSDOTTIR, SIGRUN, FETTES, DANIELLE·2008·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Child and adolescent psychiatry confronts help-seeking delays and low treatment use and adherence. Although lack of knowledge has been cited as an underlying reason, we aim to provide data on public recognition of, and beliefs about, problems and sources of help.Method The National Stigma Study-Children is the first nationally representative study of public response to child mental health problems. A face-to-face survey of 1,393 adults (response rate 70.1%, margin of error +/-3.5%) used vignettes consistent with diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression. Descriptive and multivariate analyses provide estimates of the levels and correlates of recognition, labeling, and treatment recommendations.Results Respondents do differentiate "daily troubles" from mental health problems. For the cases that meet diagnostic criteria, 58.5% correctly identify depression and 41.9% correctly identify ADHD. However, respondents are less likely to see ADHD as serious, as a mental illness, or needing treatment compared with depression. Moreover, a substantial group who correctly identifies each disorder rejects its mental illness label (ADHD 19.1%, depression 12.8%). Although women are more knowledgeable, the influence of other sociodemographic characteristics, particularly race, is complex and inconsistent. More respondents see general practitioners, mental health professionals, and teachers as suitable sources of advice than psychiatrists. Behaviors and perceived severity seem to drive public responses.Conclusions Americans have clear and consistent views of children's mental health problems. Mental health specialists face challenges in gaining family participation. Unless systematically addressed, the public's lack of knowledge, skepticism, and misinformed beliefs signal continuing problems for providers, as well as for caregivers and children seeking treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/chi.0b013e318160e3a0

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative attitudes towards people living with depression, and stigma and discrimination, are associated across several world regions with negative outcomes: low help-seeking, poor treatment adherence and poor treatment outcomes, low quality of life, and risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour.

    “Negative attitudes towards people living with depression, and stigma and discrimination, are associated across several world regions with negative outcomes: low help-seeking, poor treatment adherence and poor treatment outcomes, low quality of life, and risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour. 339-341”
  • ADHD in adults remains poorly understood and an 'emotional burden' is attached to the term, especially among professionals not traditionally involved in diagnosis/treatment.

    “ADHD in adults remains a disorder which is poorly understood and where an 'emotional burden' is attached to the term especially among professionals who have not traditionally been involved in the diagnosis or treatment of ADHD [42,44,45].”
  • Parents' favorable ratings are consistent with parental endorsement of both primary care physician mental health advice and value of self-help approaches.

    “The parents’ generally favorable ratings of the intervention are consistent with parental endorsement of both primary care physician mental health advice and value of self-help approaches.67,76,77”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PESCOSOLIDO, B. A., JENSEN, P. S., MARTIN, J. K., PERRY, B. L., OLAFSDOTTIR, S., & FETTES, D.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
PESCOSOLIDO, BERNICE A.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
339-349
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064323433
Cited by
268
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
22.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH074985, K02-MH-012989)
  • Fogarty International Center (R01TW006374)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
child mental health, public knowledge, mental health stigma, help-seeking, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, childhood depression, mental health service utilization, sources of help, sociodemographic differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Mental Disorders, Child, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Parents, Prejudice, United States, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review