The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving mechanical properties of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites produced by FDM 3D printer
Abstract
The main purpose of this research is to bolster mechanical properties of the parts, produced by an extrusion-based 3D printer, or fused deposition modeling machine, via increasing the content of continuous fiber yarn to its practical limit. In-melt continuous glass fiber yarn embedding was applied as a reliable and consistent method for simultaneous impregnation to produce continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites in the fused deposition modeling process. It is well known that the main weakness in the fused deposition modeling 3D printed products is their low strength compared to the manufactured ones by conventional methods such as injection molding and machining processes. This characteristic can be related to both inherent weakness of thermoplastic materials and poor adhesion between the deposited rasters and the layers. Although various attempts have been performed to tackle this issue, it is widely believed that using continuous fibers is the most effective method to serve this purpose if a reliable and consistent method is implemented. Since the mechanical properties of continuous fiber-reinforced composites directly depend on the content of fiber volume, maximizing the fiber content as well as producing an integrated part was assumed as the main objective. In this work, an analysis of various patterns of raster deposition was conducted, followed by the experiments and verification. The effective parameters on the fiber yarn volume, such as fiber yarn diameter, fiber yarn laying pattern, extrusion width, layer height, and flow percentage, were investigated and their optimal values were reported. The attained experimental results showed that, for polylactic acid-glass fiber yarn reinforced composite, with the extrusion width of 0.3 mm, the layer heights of 0.22 mm, flow percentage of 0.43, and the rectangular laying pattern, approximately 50% fiber-volume content can be achieved which resulted in tensile yield strength and modulus of 478 MPa and 29.4 GPa, respectively. There was an excellent agreement between these experimental results and predicted theoretically values by rule of mixture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Kabir, S. M. F., Mathur, K., & Seyam, A.-F. M. (2020) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 · Cited by 678
Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D. J. J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., et al. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925 · Cited by 268
Various FDM Mechanisms Used in the Fabrication of Continuous-Fiber Reinforced Composites: A Review
Karimi, A., Rahmatabadi, D., & Baghani, M. (2024) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym16060831 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Akhoundi, B., Behravesh, A. H., & Bagheri Saed, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-10-23
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 99-116
- ISSN
- 0731-6844 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-7964
- OpenAlex
- W2898260464
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving mechanical properties of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites produced by FDM 3D printer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0731684418807300
- The paper
- Akhoundi, B., Behravesh, A. H., & Bagheri Saed, A. (2019). Improving mechanical properties of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites produced by FDM 3D printer. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684418807300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.