Cited by 36Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accentuate the Positive: The Association Between Informal and Formal Supports and Caregiving Gains

Open access

Abstract

Background: To promote resilience among caregivers for persons living with dementia (PLWDs), we examine how formal and informal supports are linked to caregiving gains, and whether gender moderates the association between supports and gains. Method: Using the National Health and Aging Trends Study and associated National Study of Caregiving, sources of informal (emotional support, practical support, and help with the PLWD) and formal support (respite care, training program, support group) are considered as predictors of caregiving gains, with gender as a moderator of these associations. The sample included 707 caregivers for 502 PLWDs. Results: Greater caregiving gains were significantly associated with emotional support from friends/family (β = 0.14, SE = 0.09, p = .03). Furthermore, attending a caregiver training program was only associated with increased caregiving gains among men (β = 0.11, SE = 0.08, p = .02). Conclusion: Emotional support from family/friends appears particularly consequential for caregiving gains, and male caregivers may benefit most from programs that emphasize skill building.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0733464820914481

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the 2011 National Study of Caregiving, greater satisfaction from dementia caregiving was associated with more emotional support from family and friends.

    “In the 2011 National Study of Caregiving, greater satisfaction from dementia caregiving was associated with more emotional support from family members and friends.471”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [471]

    The Methods (Procedures and Sample; Measures, pages unavailable) identify the 2011 National Study of Caregiving and a sample of dementia caregivers. The Discussion (page unavailable) links having family and friends to talk to with greater caregiving gains. The outcome was a four-item caregiving-gains score that included satisfaction as one item, not a separate measure of satisfaction from caregiving. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Broyles J. F., 2006, Coach Broyles’ playbook for Alzheimer’s caregivers: A practical tips guide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leggett, A. N., Meyer, O. L., Bugajski, B. C., & Polenick, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Leggett, Amanda N.
Venue
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
763-771
ISSN
  • 0733-4648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4523
OpenAlex
W3018410104
Cited by
36
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K01AG052646, K01AG056557, K01AG059829, P30AG010129)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
dementia caregiving, caregivers, informal support, formal support, emotional support, practical support, respite care, caregiver training programs, support groups, gender differences, resilience, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Health Services, Humans, Male, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review