Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The business model of solid waste management in Sweden – a case study of two municipally-owned companies

Corvellec, Hervé, Bramryd, Torleif, Hultman, Johan·2012·Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy

Abstract

This paper describes the business model of municipally-owned MSW (municipal solid waste) companies in Sweden. A comparative study of two of these companies shows that they combine three types of activities: public service activities that collect solid waste from households, commercial establishments, and industry; processing activities that transform this waste; and marketing activities that enable products and recycled material to re-enter the economy. The historical success of the two companies rests on their ability to create value by combining these three distinct yet mutually dependent types of activities. However, an ongoing legal controversy may develop into a threat to this business model and to the entire organization of Swedish waste management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734242x11427944

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00075-1 · DOI
  2. European Court of Justice, 1998, Teckal Srl v. Comune di Viano and Azienda Gas-Acqua Consorziale (AGAC) di Reggio Emilia
  3. European Court of Justice, 2006, Carbotermo SpA, Consorzio Alisei v. Comune di Busto Arsizio, AGESP SpA
  4. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2004, Official Journal L 134: 30/04/2004, 0001
  5. Grönroos C, 2000, Service Management and Marketing: A Customer Relationship Management Approach
  6. 10.1177/0734242X07079187 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1147/sj.471.0005 · DOI
  9. Magretta J, 2002, Harvard Business Review, 80, 86
  10. 10.1007/s10551-009-0296-5 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/09505439909526548 · DOI
  12. Osterwalder A, 2005, Communications of AIS, 2005, 1
  13. Plé L, Lecocq X, Angot J (2010) Customer-integrated business models: a theoretical framework. M@n@gement (Electronic journal: www.management-aims.com) 13: 226–265. · DOI
  14. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199901)20:1<49::AID-SMJ20>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1057/9780230274075 · DOI
  16. Scheinberg A, 2010, Solid Waste Management in the World’s Cities: Water and Sanitation in the World’s Cities 2010
  17. Strasser S, 1999, Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash
  18. SYSAV, 2009, Annual Report 2009
  19. Thomasson A, 2009, Navigating in the Landscape of Ambiguity: a Stakeholder Approach to the Governance and Management of Hybrid Organisations
  20. 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Webster N, 1971, Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Corvellec, H., Bramryd, T., & Hultman, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Service Management, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden
  • Environmental Strategy, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden
Venue
Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Published
2011-12-21
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
512-518
ISSN
  • 0734-242X
  • 1096-3669
Cited by
25
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review