CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105Psychometric Methodologies and TestingReading and Literacy DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Investigation of the Reliability and Standard Error of Measurement of Words Read Correctly Per Minute Using Curriculum-Based Measurement

Poncy, Brian C., Skinner, Christopher H., Axtell, Philip K.·2005·Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
DOI 10.1177/073428290502300403
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Generalizability (G) theory was used with a sample of 37 third-grade students to assess the variability in words correct per minute (WCPM) scores caused by student skill and pas sage variability. Reliability-like coefficients and the SEM based on a specific number of assess ments using different combinations of passages demonstrated how manipulating probe vari ability could reduce measurement error. Results showed that 81 % of the variance was due to student skill, 10% was due to passage or probe variability, and 9% was due to unac counted sources of error. Reliability-like coeffi cients ranged from .81 to .99, and SEMs ranged from 18 to 4 WCPM depending on the number of probes given. When passage vari ability was controlled, SEMs were decreased and ranged from 12 to 4 WCPM. Results indi cated that WCPM scores yield high reliability- like coefficients but also have a large SEM that can be reduced by administering multiple alternate passages. Discussion focuses on con ducting research designed to identify more equivalent passages in order to reduce erro neous relative and absolute decisions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/073428290502300403

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Good, R.H., 2002, DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades (Technical Report No. 10)
  2. Good, R.H., 2002, DIBELS oral reading fluency
  3. Heartland Area Education Agency., 2002, Program manual for special education
  4. Reschly, D. J., 1998, Functional and noncategorical identification and intervention in special education
  5. Shinn, M. R., 1989, Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children
  6. Shinn, M. R., 1998, Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement
  7. Shinn, M.R. & Bamonto, S. (1989). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: "Big ideas" and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn, (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford Press.
  8. Shinn, M.R., Good, R.H. & Parker, C. (1998). Noncategorical special education services with students with severe achievement deficits. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, & J. P. Grimes, (Eds.), Functional and noncategorical identification and intervention in special education (pp. 65-84). Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Education.
  9. Tindal, G., 1983, Descriptive research on the Pine County norms: A compilation of findings. (Research Report No. 132)
  10. Tindal, G., 1983, The reliability of direct and repeated measurement. (Research Report No. 109)
  11. Ysseldyke, J. & Marston, D. (1998). Origins of categorical special education services and a rationale for changing them. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Functional and noncategorical identification and intervention in special education (pp. 15-38). Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Education.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Axtell, P. K.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2005-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
326-338
ISSN
  • 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-5144
DOI
10.1177/073428290502300403
OpenAlex
W2019696777
Cited by
105
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
reading speed, curriculum-based measurement, generalizability theory, standard error of measurement, reliability statistics, third grade, reading assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review