Cited by 20Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Age differences and educational attainment across the life span on three generations of Wechsler adult scales

Kaufman, A. S., Salthouse, T. A., Scheiber, C., Chen, H.·2016·Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Abstract

Patterns of maintenance of ability across the life span have been documented on tests of knowledge ( Gc), as have patterns of steady decline on measures of reasoning ( Gf/Gv), working memory ( Gsm), and speed ( Gs). Whether these patterns occur at the same rate for adults from different educational backgrounds has been debated. In addition, age-related research is needed to study global IQs, especially in view of the increased reliance on IQ in capital punishment court cases. In this study, large representative samples of adults tested during the standardizations of three versions of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) served as subjects: WAIS-R ( N = 1,480, ages 20-74), WAIS-III ( N = 2,093, ages 20-90), and WAIS-IV ( N = 1,800, ages 20-90). Based on regression analysis, patterns of aging on Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) and the four abilities (a) were essentially the same for males versus females and (b) characterized all levels of education across three generations of Wechsler’s adult scales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734282915619091

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pattern of cognitive ability differences across age ranges remains essentially the same regardless of educational background.

    “Nonetheless, the pattern of cognitive ability differences across age ranges remained essentially the same for individuals, regardless of their educational background.”

    From Cognitive Aging Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WAIS-5 (2025) · cites this paper as Kaufman et al. 2016

  • Prior cross-sectional research shows crystallized abilities increase from adolescence through the 50s or 60s and are maintained until about age 75, then decline rapidly, while fluid abilities and processing speed peak in the 20s and decline steadily thereafter.

    “In general, prior cross-sectional research shows increases in crystallized abilities from adolescence through to one’s 50s or 60s, and maintenance until about age 75, before these abilities decline rapidly into old age (Kaufman and Horn 1996); by contrast, fluid abilities and processing speed peak during one’s 20s, and then display a steady and often precipitous decline through to old age (Kaufman”

    From Cognitive Aging Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WAIS-5 (2025) · cites this paper as Kaufman et al. 2016

  • Higher educational attainment correlates with higher Full-Scale IQs.

    “Higher educational attainment correlated with higher Full-Scale IQs (FSIQ).”

    From Cognitive Aging Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WAIS-5 (2025) · cites this paper as Kaufman et al. 2016

  • Prior scholars using cross-sectional methodology have long proposed maintained crystallized abilities at least through late middle age, contrasted with vulnerable working memory, processing speed, and problem solving, with decline in vulnerable abilities beginning early in one's 20s and continuing steadily through the oldest age tested.

    “Prior scholars using cross-sectional methodology who examined cognitive aging have long proposed the concept of maintained crystallized abilities, at least through late middle age, contrasted with vulnerable working memory, processing speed, and problem solving (visual spatial and fluid); the sometimes dramatic decline in vulnerable abilities has shown to begin early (in one’s 20s) and continue”

    From Cognitive Aging Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WAIS-5 (2025) · cites this paper as Kaufman et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaufman, A. S., Salthouse, T. A., Scheiber, C., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Alliant University (US)
  • National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Corresponding author
Scheiber, C.
Venue
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2015-12-03
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
421-441
ISSN
  • 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-5144
OpenAlex
W2281309975
Cited by
20
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
age differences, educational attainment, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Full Scale IQ, fluid intelligence, processing speed, working memory, sex differences, WAIS-R, WAIS-III, WAIS-IV, death penalty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review