The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Power in Collaborative Planning
Open accessAbstract
This article makes a case that collaborative planning is becoming more important because it can result in network power. Collaborative policy processes are increasingly in use as ways of achieving results in an era distinguished by rapid change, social and political fragmentation, rapid high volume information flow, global interdependence, and conflicting values. Network power can be thought of as a flow of power in which participants all share. It comes into being most effectively when three conditions govern the relationship of agents in a collaborative network: diversity, interdependence, and authentic dialogue (DIAD). Like a complex adaptive system, the DIAD network as a whole is more capable of learning and adaptation in the face of fragmentation and rapid change than a set of disconnected agents. Planners have many roles in such networks, and planning education needs to incorporate new subject matter to better prepare planners for these roles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration
Axelrod, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9781400822300 · Cited by 1,759
Cited by
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Implementing multiple intervention strategies in Dutch public health-related policy networks
Harting, J., Peters, D., Grêaux, K., van Assema, P., Verweij, S., Stronks, K., & Klijn, E.-H. (2019) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dax067 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Planning Education and Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-236
- ISSN
- 0739-456X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6577
- OpenAlex
- W2096166347
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Power in Collaborative Planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0739456x0202100301
- The paper
- Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x0202100301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.