Cited by 35Online and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesEducational Technology and E-Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Generating and Facilitating Effective Online Learning through Discussion

Maddix, Mark A.·2012·Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry

Abstract

In Christian higher education, most teaching and learning has been confined to the traditional classroom. However, with the advent of computer technology many universities and seminaries are offering online courses and programs. These online courses provide facilitators and teachers with a different learning context. One of the most important social learning components of online learning is discussion forums. These forums provide a context for faculty-student and student-student interaction. For teachers facilitating discussion, this can become an overwhelming task, especially when there is too much or not enough student interaction. This article addresses such questions as: How can teachers ensure that discussion is contributing to learning. How much interaction is necessary and what constitutes effective interaction? How can we ensure that students engage in thoughtful discussion? This article explores how teachers can facilitate effective online learning through discussion. The article also presents a framework for effective online discussion called the Community Inquiry Model (Garrison & Anderson, 2011). The article provides guidelines for teachers to develop discussion board rubrics and effective faculty-student and student-student interaction in online courses. The article concludes by providing best practices of online discussion based on current research and personal experience in teaching online courses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/073989131200900209

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Allen I.E., 2010, Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009.
  2. Berge Z. L., 1995, Educational Technology,, 35, 22
  3. Chickering A. W., 1987, American Association of Higher Education Bulletin,, 39, 3
  4. Chickering A.W., 1996, American Academy of Higher Education Bulletin,, 49, 3
  5. 10.4324/9780203166093 · DOI
  6. 10.4324/9780203838761 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Grant M., 2007, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,, 3, 346
  8. Lorenzetti J. P., 2010, Distant Education Report,, 17, 1
  9. 10.1177/073989131000700212 · DOI
  10. Palloff R. M., 1999, Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom.
  11. Palloff R. M., 2003, The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners.
  12. Palloff R. M., 2007, Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom
  13. Rouke L., 1999, Journal of Distance Education,, 14, 50
  14. Vasely P., 2007, MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning,, 3, 234
  15. Xie K., 2011, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,, 7, 17

Metadata

Authors
Maddix, M. A.
Affiliations
Northwest Nazarene University (US)
Corresponding author
Maddix, Mark A.
Venue
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry
Published
2012-11
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
372-385
ISSN
  • 0739-8913 (ISSN-L)
  • 2378-525X
OpenAlex
W2790012393
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Christian Education Journal Research on Educational Ministry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
online learning, online forums, discussion facilitation, Christian higher education, seminaries, student-student interaction, faculty-student interaction, social learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generating and Facilitating Effective Online Learning through Discussion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/073989131200900209
The paper
Maddix, M. A. (2012). Generating and Facilitating Effective Online Learning through Discussion. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry. https://doi.org/10.1177/073989131200900209