Cited by 157LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyIdentity, Memory, and TherapyImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Let Me Do What I Please With It . . . Don’t Decide My Identity For Me”: LGBTQ+ Youth Experiences of Social Media in Narrative Identity Development

Open access
Bates, Adam, Hobman, Trish, Bell, Beth T.·2020·Journal of Adolescent Research

Abstract

Social media provides Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Queer Plus (LGBTQ+) youth with daily access to a broader sociocultural dialogue that may shape narrative identity development. Through in-depth narrative interviews, this study sought to understand the lived experiences of 11 LGBTQ+ undergraduates ( age range = 19-23) building narrative identities in the cultural context of social media and the role of social media within this process. Interviews were analyzed using an interpretative, individual analysis of personal stories. These experiences were then compared and contrasted through thematic analysis to identify four shared narrative themes. Narratives of merging safe spaces highlight how LGBTQ+ youth now have regular access to safe environments online/offline which facilitate more secure identity development. Narratives of external identity alignment describe social media as a tool for LGBTQ+ youth to seek out identities that match their preexisting sense of self. Narratives of multiple context-based identities encapsulate how adolescents’ identity markers are multiple and invoked in a context-dependent manner. Finally, narratives of individuality and autonomy characterize how LGBTQ+ youth perceive themselves as highly individualized members of a wider community. These findings highlight the complex role social media plays within LGBTQ+ youth identity development. The implications are discussed within.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0743558419884700

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using digital media gets individuals in touch with different possible ways of narrating their lives, which can include both culturally dominant master narratives and alternative narratives that might be particularly important for marginalized groups or groups of individuals with non-mainstream interests.

    “using digital media gets individuals in touch with different possible ways of narrating their lives (Granic et al., 2020), which can include both culturally dominant master narratives as well as alternative narratives that might be particularly important for marginalized groups or groups of individuals with non-mainstream interests (cf.Bates et al., 2020).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Bates et al., 2020

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.002 · DOI
  2. 10.1075/ni.16.1.18bam · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-3-319-33450-9_2 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/2628363.2628406 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1461444815621527 · DOI
  6. boyd d., 2011, A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, 39
  7. boyd d., 2014, It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens
  8. Bruner J., 1990, Acts of meaning
  9. 10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.43 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10964-006-9110-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.005 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/19359705.2013.777007 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Crenshaw K., 1989, The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139
  14. 10.1177/1461444811422430 · DOI
  15. 10.4018/978-1-5225-1856-3.ch001 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/3274313 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Driver S., 2007, Queer girls and popular culture: Reading, resisting and creating media
  18. 10.1177/1461444814549930 · DOI
  19. Erikson E. H., 1968, Identity, youth, and crisis
  20. 10.1177/0265407510391338 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.009 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/104973200129118499 · DOI
  23. Goffman E., 1959, The presentation of self in everyday life
  24. 10.1007/s10964-008-9342-3 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/15299710802659997 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00544.x · DOI
  27. 10.1177/1363460707072956 · DOI
  28. Hostetler A. J., 1998, Social Research, 65, 249
  29. Josselson R., 2011, Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry, 224
  30. 10.1177/0743558414528975 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.015 · DOI
  32. Manning J., 2016, Contemporary studies of sexuality & communication: Theoretical and applied perspectives
  33. 10.1177/0731121417753370 · DOI
  34. McAdams D. P., 2008, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 242
  35. McAdams D. P., 2015, The art and science of personality development
  36. 10.1111/jopy.12341 · DOI
  37. 10.1159/000445817 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Miller S. (2015). A queer literacy framework promoting (a)gender and (a)sexuality self-determination and justice. The English Journal, 104(5), 37-44. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24484578 · DOI
  39. 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302976 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/sgd0000097 · DOI
  41. 10.1159/000100939 · DOI
  42. Patton M. Q., 2002, Qualitative research and evaluation methods
  43. 10.1007/s10964-012-9865-5 · DOI
  44. Polkinghorne D., 1988, Narrative knowing and the human sciences
  45. 10.1300/J082v51n02_02 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/15299716.2014.986315 · DOI
  47. Ricoeur P., 1984, Time and narrative, 3
  48. Riessman C. K., 1993, Narrative analysis
  49. Riessman C. K., 2008, Narrative methods for the human sciences
  50. Sarbin T. R., 1986, Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct
  51. 10.4159/9780674043138 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00260.x · DOI
  53. 10.1080/00918369.2015.1073032 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/1461444814544000 · DOI
  55. 10.1353/jip.2015.0021 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/09658210903153923 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bates, A., Hobman, T., & Bell, B. T.
Affiliations
York St John University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bates, Adam
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Research
Published
2019-11-03
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
51-83
ISSN
  • 0743-5584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6895
OpenAlex
W2982344599
Cited by
157
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Research (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research at York St John (York St John University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
LGBTQ youth, social media, identity construction, safe spaces, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review