The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Neurospora Circadian System
Abstract
The eukaryotic filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa has proven to be a durable and dependable model system for the analysis of the cellular and molecular bases of circadian rhythms. Pioneering genetic analyses identified clock genes, and beginning with the cloning of frequency ( frq), work over the past 2 decades has revealed the molecular basis of a core circadian clock feedback loop that has illuminated our understanding of circadian oscillators in microbes, plants, and animals. In this transcription/translation-based feedback loop, a heterodimer of the White Collar-1 (WC-1) and WC-2 proteins acts both as the circadian photoreceptor and, in the dark, as a transcription factor that promotes the expression of the frq gene. FRQ dimerizes and feeds back to block the activity of its activators (making a negative feedback loop), as well as feeding forward to promote the synthesis of its activator, WC-1. Phosphorylation of FRQ by several kinases leads to its ubiquitination and turnover, releasing the WC-1/WC-2 dimer to reactivate frq expression and restart the circadian cycle. Light resetting of the clock can be understood through the rapid light induction of frq expression and temperature resetting through the influence of elevated temperaturesin driving higher levels of FRQ. Several FRQ- and WC-independent, noncircadian FRQ-less oscillators (FLOs) have been described, each of which appears to regulate aspects of Neurospora growth or development. Overall, the FRQ/white collar complex feedback loop appears to coordinate the circadian system through its activity to regulate downstream-target clock-controlled genes, either directly or via regulation of driven FLOs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Bases for Circadian Clocks
Dunlap, J. C. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80566-8 · Cited by 2,900
Self-citationBobrowicz, P., Pawlak, R., Correa, A., Bell‐Pedersen, D., & Ebbole, D. J. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03052.x · Cited by 132
Cited by
Reconstitution of Circadian Oscillation of Cyanobacterial KaiC Phosphorylation in Vitro
Nakajima, M., Imai, K., Ito, H., Nishiwaki, T., Murayama, Y., Iwasaki, H., Oyama, T., & Kondo, T. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1108451 · Cited by 1,107
Covington, M. F., Maloof, J. N., Straume, M., Kay, S. A., & Harmer, S. L. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r130 · Cited by 747
The Circadian Clock Regulates Auxin Signaling and Responses in Arabidopsis
Covington, M. F., & Harmer, S. L. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050222 · Cited by 364
Interplay of Circadian Clocks and Metabolic Rhythms
Wijnen, H., & Young, M. W. (2006) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090603 · Cited by 339
Circadian Control of Global Gene Expression Patterns
Doherty, C. J., & Kay, S. A. (2010) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163432 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunlap, J. C., & Loros, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Rhythms
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 414-424
- ISSN
- 0748-7304 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4531
- OpenAlex
- W2102142621
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Neurospora Circadian System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0748730404269116
- The paper
- Dunlap, J. C., & Loros, J. J. (2004). The Neurospora Circadian System. Journal of Biological Rhythms. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730404269116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.