Cited by 35Circadian rhythm and melatoninRetinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aging Alters Circadian Rhythms in the Mouse Eye

Open access
Baba, Kenkichi, Tosini, Gianluca·2018·Journal of Biological Rhythms

Abstract

The eye contains a circadian system that acts independently from the master circadian clock located in the brain. This circadian system regulates important physiological functions within the eye. Emerging experimental evidence also indicates that disruption of the ocular circadian clock, or its outputs, negatively affects the overall health of the eye. Although previous studies have investigated the effect of aging on the regulation of circadian rhythms, no study has investigated the effects of aging on the circadian rhythm in the ocular system. The aim of the present study was to investigate how aging affects the circadian rhythm of PER2::LUC bioluminescence in the retina, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and cornea. Our data suggest that among the 3 different ocular tissues investigated, the retina appears to be the most affected by aging whereas the RPE and cornea are less affected by aging. Our data, along with studies of other organs and tissues, suggest that reduction in the amplitude of rhythms is probably the most severe effect of aging on the circadian clock.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0748730418783648

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Baba K, 2010, Mol Vis, 16, 2605

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Baba, K., & Tosini, G.
Affiliations
Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Tosini, Gianluca
Venue
Journal of Biological Rhythms
Published
2018-06-25
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
441-445
ISSN
  • 0748-7304 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4531
OpenAlex
W2811137840
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Rhythms (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS083932)
  • National Eye Institute (EY022216, EY026291)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM116760)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
aging, circadian rhythm, retina, retinal pigment epithelium, cornea, ocular aging
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Cornea, Luminescent Measurements, Retina, Mice, Retinal Pigment Epithelium, Period Circadian Proteins, Circadian Clocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review