Cited by 2,329Circadian rhythm and melatoninNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues

Open access
Yoo, Seung-Hee, Yamazaki, Shin, Lowrey, Phillip L., Shimomura, Kazuhiro, Ko, Caroline H., Buhr, Ethan D., Siepka, Sandra M., Hong, Hee-Kyung +4 more·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Mammalian circadian rhythms are regulated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), and current dogma holds that the SCN is required for the expression of circadian rhythms in peripheral tissues. Using a PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE fusion protein as a real-time reporter of circadian dynamics in mice, we report that, contrary to previous work, peripheral tissues are capable of self-sustained circadian oscillations for >20 cycles in isolation. In addition, peripheral organs expressed tissue-specific differences in circadian period and phase. Surprisingly, lesions of the SCN in mPer2(Luciferase) knockin mice did not abolish circadian rhythms in peripheral tissues, but instead caused phase desynchrony among the tissues of individual animals and from animal to animal. These results demonstrate that peripheral tissues express self-sustained, rather than damped, circadian oscillations and suggest the existence of organ-specific synchronizers of circadian rhythms at the cell and tissue level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0308709101

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. [1]Ralph, M. R., Foster, R. G., Davis, F. C. & Menaker, M. (1990) Science 247, 975–978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Weaver, D. R. (1998) J. Biol. Rhythms 13, 100–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [4]Reppert, S. M. & Weaver, D. R. (2002) Nature 418, 935–941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [5]Plautz, J. D., Kaneko, M., Hall, J. C. & Kay, S. A. (1997) Science 278, 1632–1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [6]Tosini, G. & Menaker, M. (1996) Science 272, 419–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [7]Yamazaki, S., Numano, R., Abe, M., Hida, A., Takahashi, R., Ueda, M., Block, G. D., Sakaki, Y., Menaker, M. & Tei, H. (2000) Science 288, 682–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [8]Abe, M., Herzog, E. D., Yamazaki, S., Straume, M., Tei, H., Sakaki, Y., Menaker, M. & Block, G. D. (2002) J. Neurosci. 22, 350–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [9]Balsalobre, A., Damiola, F. & Schibler, U. (1998) Cell 93, 929–937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [10]Schibler, U., Ripperger, J. & Brown, S. A. (2003) J. Biol. Rhythms 18, 250–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [11]Zylka, M. J., Shearman, L. P., Weaver, D. R. & Reppert, S. M. (1998) Neuron 20, 1103–1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [12]Lee, C., Etchegaray, J. P., Cagampang, F. R., Loudon, A. S. & Reppert, S. M. (2001) Cell 107, 855–867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [13]Field, M. D., Maywood, E. S., O'Brien, J. A., Weaver, D. R., Reppert, S. M. & Hastings, M. H. (2000) Neuron 25, 437–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [14]Akhtar, R. A., Reddy, A. B., Maywood, E. S., Clayton, J. D., King, V. M., Smith, A. G., Gant, T. W., Hastings, M. H. & Kyriacou, C. P. (2002) Curr. Biol. 12, 540–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [15]Sakamoto, K., Nagase, T., Fukui, H., Horikawa, K., Okada, T., Tanaka, H., Sato, K., Miyake, Y., Ohara, O., Kako, K. & Ishida, N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27039–27042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [16]Kuhlman, S. J., Quintero, J. E. & McMahon, D. G. (2000) NeuroReport 11, 1479–1482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [17]Yamaguchi, S., Mitsui, S., Miyake, S., Yan, L., Onishi, H., Yagita, K., Suzuki, M., Shibata, S., Kobayashi, M. & Okamura, H. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 873–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [18]Wilsbacher, L. D., Yamazaki, S., Herzog, E. D., Song, E. J., Radcliffe, L. A., Abe, M., Block, G., Spitznagel, E., Menaker, M. & Takahashi, J. S. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 489–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [19]Antoch, M. P., Song, E. J., Chang, A. M., Vitaterna, M. H., Zhao, Y., Wilsbacher, L. D., Sangoram, A. M., King, D. P., Pinto, L. H. & Takahashi, J. S. (1997) Cell 89, 655–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. [20]Vitaterna, M. H., King, D. P., Chang, A. M., Kornhauser, J. M., Lowrey, P. L., McDonald, J. D., Dove, W. F., Pinto, L. H., Turek, F. W. & Takahashi, J. S. (1994) Science 264, 719–725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [21]Shimomura, K., Low-Zeddies, S. S., King, D. P., Steeves, T. D., Whiteley, A., Kushla, J., Zemenides, P. D., Lin, A., Vitaterna, M. H., Churchill, G. A. & Takahashi, J. S. (2001) Genome Res. 11, 959–980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [22]Sokolove, P. G. & Bushell, W. N. (1978) J. Theor. Biol. 72, 131–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [23]Takahashi, J. S. & Menaker, M. (1982) J. Neurosci. 2, 815–828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [24]Stokkan, K. A., Yamazaki, S., Tei, H., Sakaki, Y. & Menaker, M. (2001) Science 291, 490–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. [25]Yamazaki, S., Straume, M., Tei, H., Sakaki, Y., Menaker, M. & Block, G. D. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10801–10806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. [26]Zheng, B., Larkin, D. W., Albrecht, U., Sun, Z. S., Sage, M., Eichele, G., Lee, C. C. & Bradley, A. (1999) Nature 400, 169–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. [27]Damiola, F., Le Minh, N., Preitner, N., Kornmann, B., Fleury-Olela, F. & Schibler, U. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 2950–2961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. [28]Panda, S., Antoch, M. P., Miller, B. H., Su, A. I., Schook, A. B., Straume, M., Schultz, P. G., Kay, S. A., Takahashi, J. S. & Hogenesch, J. B. (2002) Cell 109, 307–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. [30]Terazono, H., Mutoh, T., Yamaguchi, S., Kobayashi, M., Akiyama, M., Udo, R., Ohdo, S., Okamura, H. & Shibata, S. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6795–6800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. [31]Iijima, M., Nikaido, T., Akiyama, M., Moriya, T. & Shibata, S. (2002) Eur. J. Neurosci. 16, 921–929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. [32]Hara, R., Wan, K., Wakamatsu, H., Aida, R., Moriya, T., Akiyama, M. & Shibata, S. (2001) Genes Cells 6, 269–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. [33]Berson, D. M. (2003) Trends Neurosci. 26, 314–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. [34]Meijer, J. H. & Rietveld, W. J. (1989) Physiol. Rev. 69, 671–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. [36]Moore, R. Y. (1997) Annu. Rev. Med. 48, 253–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. [37]Buijs, R. M. & Kalsbeek, A. (2001) Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 521–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. [38]Hastings, M. H., Reddy, A. B. & Maywood, E. S. (2003) Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 649–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. [39]Young, M. W. & Kay, S. A. (2001) Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 702–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. [40]Roenneberg, T. & Merrow, M. (2003) Curr. Biol. 13, R198–R207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. [41]Rosbash, M. (1998) Cell 93, 917–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoo, S.-H., Yamazaki, S., Lowrey, P. L., Shimomura, K., Ko, C. H., Buhr, E. D., Siepka, S. M., Hong, H.-K., Oh, W. J., Yoo, O. J., Menaker, M., & Takahashi, J. S.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-02-12
Volume
101
Issue
15
Pages
5339-5346
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2014313900
Cited by
2,329
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 132 · 2014: 121 · 2013: 121 · 2012: 114
FWCI
29.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH056647, MH 56647)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
circadian rhythm, peripheral circadian rhythms, suprachiasmatic nucleus, circadian period, circadian phase
MeSH terms
Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Cornea, Female, Kidney, Liver, Luciferases, Luminescent Measurements, Lung, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Activity, Nuclear Proteins, Phenotype, Pituitary Gland, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Culture Techniques, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review