CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 275Circadian rhythm and melatoninGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Significance of Circadian Organization for Longevity in the Golden Hamster

Hurd, Mark W., Ralph, Martin R.·1998·Journal of Biological Rhythms
DOI 10.1177/074873098129000255
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

While functional roles for biological clocks have been demonstrated in organisms throughout phylogeny, the adaptive advantages of circadian organization per se are largely matters of conjecture. It is generally accepted, though without direct experimental evidence, that organisms derive primary benefits from the temporal organization of their physiology and behavior, as well as from the anticipation of daily changes in their environment and their own fluctuating physiological requirements. However, the consequences of circadian dysfunction that might demonstrate a primary adaptive advantage and explain the natural origins and apparent ubiquity of circadian systems have not been documented. The authors report that longevity in hamsters is decreased with a noninvasive disruption of rhythmicity and is increased in older animals given suprachiasmatic implants that restore higher amplitude rhythms. The results substantiate the importance of the temporal organization of physiology and behavior provided by the circadian clock to the health and longevity of an organism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/074873098129000255

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Brock, 1991, J Am Psychiatr Assoc, 39, 74
  2. Cai A, 1997, Am J Physiol, 272, R422
  3. Halberg and Cadotte, 1975, Chronobiologia, 2, 26
  4. Hurd MW (1996) Pacemaker-pacemaker communication in the mammalian circadian system. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
  5. Hurd MW, 1995, Am J Physiol, 269, R958
  6. Kripke DF, 1978, Biol Psychiat, 13, 335
  7. Minors DS, 1987, Aviation Med Quart, 1, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 275

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hurd, M. W., & Ralph, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Biological Rhythms
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1998-10
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
430-436
ISSN
  • 0748-7304 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4531
DOI
10.1177/074873098129000255
OpenAlex
W1975982492
Cited by
275
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Rhythms (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Natural Sciences
  • National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
circadian clock, longevity, golden hamster, suprachiasmatic nucleus, circadian rhythm disruption, aging
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Environment, Cricetinae, Longevity, Mesocricetus, Motor Activity, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Fetal Tissue Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review