Cited by 7Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Canadian Undergraduates’ Perspectives on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): A Quantitative Study

Open access
Hawrelak, Erin, Harper, Lori, Reddon, John R., Powell, Russell A.·2022·Journal of Palliative Care

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In 2016, Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) became legal in Canada for those suffering a grievous and untreatable medical condition. Currently, it is not available to minors or to those with an untreatable mental illness, although it is likely the scope of MAiD will be widened to include persons with severe and untreatable mental illnesses. However, little is known about the factors predicting acceptance or rejection of MAiD for persons with either a grievous medical condition or an untreatable mental illness. Methods: A survey was administered to 438 undergraduate students to examine factors associated with their acceptance or rejection of MAiD. The survey included four different scenarios: a young or old person with an untreatable medical condition, and a young or old person with an untreatable mental illness. Demographic questions (age, sex, religion, etc), personality measures, and an attitude towards euthanasia scale were also administered, as well as questions assessing participants’ general understanding of MAiD and their life experiences with death and suicide. Results/Conclusion: Overall, most of the Canadian undergraduate participants accepted MAiD for both terminally ill and mentally ill patients; however, different variables, such as age, religion, and ethnicity, predicted the acceptance or rejection of MAiD for each scenario.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/08258597211050738

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hawrelak et al found that most undergraduate students endorsed MAiD for both physical and mental health conditions, viewing it as a legitimate expression of compassion and autonomy.

    “Hawrelak et al found that most undergraduate students endorsed MAiD for both physical and mental health conditions, viewing it as a legitimate expression of compassion and autonomy.”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Conclusion and Results support that most surveyed Canadian undergraduates accepted MAiD for patients with terminal illness and with untreatable mental illness. The Methods describe choices about whether to allow MAiD, but the paper does not establish that students viewed it as an expression of compassion and autonomy. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]Charland LC LicJur TL Wada K. Decision-making capacity to consent to medical assistance in dying for persons with mental disorders. J Ethics Ment Health. 2016; 2016 (open volume): 1- 14. May 26 2016. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 2784291.
  2. [6]von Fuchs R. MAid and mental illness: critical thoughts, constructive thoughts. J Ethics Ment Health. 2017; 10: 1- 6. https://jemh.ca/issues/v9/documents/JEMH%20final%20Reflection-iii.pdf.
  3. [7]Hurwitz TA. Euthanasia in mental illness: a four part series. Part II: sadness and suicidality: why mentally ill patients request euthanasia. J Ethics Ment Health. 2018; 10: 1- 6. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://jemh.ca/issues/v9/documents/JEMH%20final%20Reflection-.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawrelak, E., Harper, L., Reddon, J. R., & Powell, R. A.
Affiliations
  • MacEwan University (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Harper, Lori
Venue
Journal of Palliative Care
Published
2021-12-30
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
352-358
ISSN
  • 0825-8597 (ISSN-L)
  • 2369-5293
OpenAlex
W4200185976
Cited by
7
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, attitudes toward euthanasia, dying patients, age differences, ethnicity, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Canada, Humans, Medical Assistance, Students, Suicide, Assisted, Terminally Ill

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review