Cited by 3Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Canadian Undergraduate Perspectives on Medical Assistance in Dying for Mental Illness: Does Psychiatric Illness Type, Age, and Exposure to Information Influence Acceptance of MAiD?

Open access
Harper, Lori, Tomaras, Christina A., Powell, Russell A., Reddon, John R., Hawrelak, Erin·2025·American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesIn 2027, Canadians whose only medical condition is an untreatable mental illness and who otherwise meet all eligibility criteria will be able to request Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). This study investigates the attitudes of undergraduate students towards widening the scope of MAiD for physical illness for certain psychiatric conditions. We were interested in understanding if age, information, and type of mental illness influenced undergraduates' acceptance or rejection of MAiD for mental illness (MAiD-MI).Method413 undergraduate students participated in this study which examined the factors that correlate with the acceptance or rejection of MAiD-MI. Four scenarios were presented in which age (older or younger) and illness type (depression or schizophrenia) were manipulated. Demographic questions and measures assessing personality, religion, and attitudes towards euthanasia were administered. Questions assessing participants' general understanding of MAiD and their life experiences with death and suicide were also asked.ResultsMost of the participants accepted MAiD-MI for both depression and schizophrenia. As hypothesized, support for MAiD-MI was higher for patients with schizophrenia than for depression. Also as hypothesized, support was higher for older patients than for younger patients. Variables such as religion, personality and political affiliation were also associated with acceptance or rejection of MAiD-MI. Finally, consistent with our hypotheses, participants' understanding of MAiD and experiences with death and suicide was predictive of support for MAiD-MI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10499091241247835

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A subsequent national comparison across multiple universities reaffirmed the trend of increasing acceptance, suggesting that younger generations hold more permissive views toward MAiD MD-SUMC.

    “A subsequent national comparison across multiple universities reaffirmed this trend, suggesting that younger generations hold more permissive views toward MAiD MD-SUMC.”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Abstract’s Results (page not supplied) say that most surveyed undergraduates accepted MAiD for mental illness, supporting the claim’s point about acceptance among students. The Method > Participants section describes students receiving credit in introductory psychology classes, not a national comparison across universities, and the paper does not compare generations or establish an increasing trend. Its age comparison concerns the patients in the scenarios, not the ages of people expressing views. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Nordt C Rössler W Lauber C. Attitudes of mental health professionals toward people with schizophrenia and major depression. Schizophr Bull. 2006; 32(4): 709- 714. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5872.2012.00208.x. 16510695 PMC2632277 · DOI
  2. [23]Magliano L Ruggiero G Read J Mancuso A Schiavone A Sepe A. The views of non-psychiatric medical specialists about people with schizophrenia and depression. Community Ment Health J. 2020; 56: 1077- 1084. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-020-00567. 32020387 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harper, L., Tomaras, C. A., Powell, R. A., Reddon, J. R., & Hawrelak, E.
Affiliations
  • MacEwan University (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Harper, Lori
Venue
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2024-05-02
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
678-687
ISSN
  • 1049-9091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2715
OpenAlex
W4396592576
Cited by
3
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, mental illness, attitudes toward euthanasia, depression, schizophrenia, age differences, information exposure, personality, political affiliation, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attitude to Death, Mental Disorders, Canada, Female, Humans, Male, Schizophrenia, Students, Suicide, Assisted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review