Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Melatonin for Chronic Sleep Onset Insomnia in Children: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Smits, Marcel G., Nagtegaal, Elsbeth E., van der Heijden, Janine, Coenen, Anton M.L., Kerkhof, Gerard A.·2001·Journal of Child Neurology

Abstract

To establish the efficacy of melatonin treatment in childhood sleep onset insomnia, 40 elementary school children, 6 to 12 years of age, who suffered more than 1 year from chronic sleep onset insomnia, were studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The children were randomly assigned to receive either 5-mg melatonin or placebo. The study consisted of a 1-week baseline, consecutively followed by a 4-week treatment period. After that period, treatment was continued if the parents wished so. The study's impact was assessed by measurements of lights-off time, sleep onset, and wake-up time, recorded in a diary (n = 33). Sleep onset was also recorded with an actigraph (n = 25). Endogenous dim light melatonin onset was measured in saliva (n = 27). Sustained attention was evaluated with the Bourdon-Vos reaction time test (n = 36). In the melatonin group, mean (95% CI) lights-off time advanced 34 (6-63) minutes, diary sleep onset 63 (32-94) minutes, actigraphic sleep onset 75 (36-114) minutes, and melatonin onset 57 (24 to 89) minutes; total sleep time increased 41 (19-62) minutes. In the placebo group, these parameters did not shift significantly. The change during the 4-week treatment period differed between the treatment groups significantly as to lights-off time, diary and actigraphic sleep onset, sleep duration, and melatonin onset. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the change of sleep latency, wake-up time, and sustained attention reaction times. Mild headache occurred in 2 children during the first 2 days of the melatonin treatment. Eighteen months after the start of the trial, in 13 of the 38 children who could be followed up, melatonin treatment was stopped because their sleep problem was solved and in 1 child because sleep was not improved. Twelve children used melatonin 5 mg, the other 1.0 to 2.5 mg. One child developed mild generalized epilepsy 4 months after the start of the trial. The results show that melatonin, 5 mg at 6 PM, was relatively safe to take in the short term and significantly more effective than placebo in advancing sleep onset and dim light melatonin onset and increasing sleep duration in elementary school children with chronic sleep onset insomnia. Sustained attention was not affected. (J Child Neurol 2001;16:86-92).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/088307380101600204

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Smits, M. G., Nagtegaal, E. E., van der Heijden, J., Coenen, A. M. L., & Kerkhof, G. A.
Venue
Journal of Child Neurology
Published
2001-02
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
86-92
ISSN
  • 0883-0738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8283
OpenAlex
W1973265109
Cited by
211
References
2
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Melatonin for Chronic Sleep Onset Insomnia in Children: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/088307380101600204
The paper
Smits, M. G., Nagtegaal, E. E., van der Heijden, J., Coenen, A. M. L., & Kerkhof, G. A. (2001). Melatonin for Chronic Sleep Onset Insomnia in Children: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307380101600204

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.