Cited by 220Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Long‐term follow‐up of melatonin treatment in children with ADHD and chronic sleep onset insomnia

Hoebert, Michel, Van Der Heijden, Kristiaan B., Van Geijlswijk, Ingeborg M., Smits, Marcel G.·2009·Journal of Pineal Research

Abstract

Abstract: We conducted this study to assess long‐term melatonin treatment course, effectiveness and safety in children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and chronic sleep onset insomnia (CSOI). This was conducted by means of a structured questionnaire for the parents. The subjects of this study consisted of participants who previously participated in a randomised clinical trial on melatonin efficacy. The response rate was 93% (94/101). The mean time to follow up was 3.7 yr. No serious adverse events or treatment related co‐morbidities were reported. Sixty‐five percent of the children still used melatonin daily and 12% occasionally. Temporal discontinuation of treatment resulted in a delay of sleep onset in 92% of the children. Nine percent of the children could discontinue melatonin completely because of improvement of sleep onset insomnia. Long‐term melatonin treatment was judged to be effective against sleep onset problems in 88% of the cases. Improvement of behaviour and mood was reported in 71% and 61% respectively. We conclude that melatonin remains an effective therapy on the long term for the treatment of CSOI in children with ADHD and has no safety concerns regarding serious adverse events or treatment related co‐morbidity. Discontinuation of melatonin treatment usually leads to a relapse of sleep onset insomnia and in resuming melatonin treatment, even after several years of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-079x.2009.00681.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoebert, M., Van Der Heijden, K. B., Van Geijlswijk, I. M., & Smits, M. G.
Affiliations
Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei (NL)
Corresponding author
Smits, Marcel G.
Venue
Journal of Pineal Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 0742-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-079X
OpenAlex
W2115975725
Cited by
220
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
19.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pineal Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
melatonin, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, long-term treatment, treatment discontinuation, treatment safety, sleep onset delay
MeSH terms
Affect, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Central Nervous System Depressants, Child, Child Behavior, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Melatonin, Surveys and Questionnaires, Chi-Square Distribution, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review