Cited by 70Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Cognitive-Affective Predictors of Women’s Readiness to End Domestic Violence Relationships

Open access
Shurman, Lauren A., Rodriguez, Christina M.·2006·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

A model of women’s readiness to terminate an abusive relationship was examined, using cognitive and emotional factors to predict readiness to change as conceptualized in the transtheoretical model. Factors previously identified in the domestic violence literature were selected to represent cognitive predictors (attribution and attachment style) and affective predictors (depression, hopelessness, anxiety, and anger) of readiness to end a domestic violence relationship. Responses by 85 female victims of intimate partner violence indicated that their overall readiness to terminate a relationship was predicted by a preoccupied attachment style and high emotional arousal. However, women’s low level of anger predicted their precontemplation of change, the earliest stage of readiness, whereas internalizing emotional difficulties and preoccupation with their batterer predicted maintenance, the final stage of readiness to persist in their decision to leave their abuser. Implications of these findings for working with women considering leaving their partner are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260506292993

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only four studies failed to find some kind of relationship between attachment and physical IPV victimization.

    “Considering the specific dimensions of attachment, only four studies failed to find some kind of relationship with physical IPV victimization (Bookwala, 2002; Orcutt et al., 2005; Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006; Rapoza and Baker, 2008).”

    From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006

  • Studies conducted on women with reported history of IPV mainly failed to find an association between anxious attachment and psychological victimization.

    “Regarding the anxious dimension, studies conducted on women with reported history of IPV mainly failed to find an association between anxious attachment and psychological victimization (Henderson et al., 1997; Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006; Kuijpers et al., 2012).”

    From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006

  • Almost half of the studies found that psychological IPV victimization was not associated with anxious or avoidant dimensions of attachment.

    “Noteworthy, almost half of the studies found that psychological IPV victimization was not associated with anxious or avoidant dimensions of attachment (Henderson et al., 1997; Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006; Wigman et al., 2008; Oka et al., 2014; Bélanger et al., 2015; Tougas et al., 2016).”

    From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.
  2. Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A., & Dutton, D. (2001). Insecure attachment and abusive inti- mate relationships. In C. Clulow (Ed.), Adult attachment and couple psychotherapy. The "secure base" in practice and research (pp. 43-61). Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
  3. Beck, A. T., Brown, G., Epstein, N., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 893-897.
  4. Beck, A. T., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The hopeless- ness scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861-865.
  5. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77-100.
  6. Berman, W. H., & Sperling, M. B. (1994). The structure and function of adult attachment. In M. B. Sperling & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives (pp. 1-28). New York: Guilford.
  7. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  8. Cascardi, M., & O'Leary, K. D. (1992). Depressive symptomatology, self-esteem, and self- blame in battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 249-259.
  9. Fenney, J. A., Noller, P., & Hanrahan, M. (1994). Assessing adult attachment. In M. B. Sperling & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives (pp. 128-152). New York: Guilford.
  10. Griffing, S., Ragin, D. F., Sage, R. E., Madry, L., Bingham, L. E., & Primm, B. J. (2002). Domestic violence survivors' self-identified reasons for returning to abusive relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 306-319.
  11. Henderson, A. J. Z., Bartholomew, K., & Dutton, D. G. (1997). He loves me; he loves me not: Attachment and separation resolution of abused women. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 169-191.
  12. Herbert, T. B., Silver, R. C., & Ellard, J. H. (1991). Coping with an abusive relationship: How and why do women stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 311-325.
  13. O'Neill, M. L., & Kerig, P. K. (2000). Attributions of self-blame and perceived control as mod- erators of adjustment in battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1036-1050.
  14. Riggs, D. S., Caulfield, M. B., & Street, A. E. (2000). Risk for domestic violence: Factors asso- ciated with perpetration and victimization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1289-1316.
  15. Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
  16. Shepard, M. F., & Campbell, J. A. (1992). The abusive behavior inventory: A measure of psy- chological and physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 291-305.
  17. Strube, M. J. (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236-250.
  18. Truman-Schram, D. M., Cann, A., Calhoun, L., & Vanwallendael, L. (2000). Leaving an abu- sive dating relationship: An investment model comparison of women who stay versus women who leave. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 161-183.
  19. Vazquez, C. I. (1996). Spousal abuse and violence against women: The significance of under- standing attachment. In J. A. Sechzer, S. M. Pfafflin, F. Denmark, A. Griffin, & S. Blumenthal (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 789. Women and mental health (pp. 119-128). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
  20. Walker, L. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
  21. Walker, L. (2000). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shurman, L. A., & Rodriguez, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2006-11
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1417-1439
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2170407205
Cited by
70
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
intimate partner violence, transtheoretical model, attribution, depression, hopelessness, anxiety, anger, precontemplation, emotional arousal, leaving abusive relationships
MeSH terms
Adult, Anger, Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spouse Abuse, Women's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review