CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 247Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychosocial Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence for Women and Men in Canada

Ansara, Donna L., Hindin, Michelle J.·2011·Journal of Interpersonal Violence
DOI 10.1177/0886260510370600
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although the negative health consequences of intimate partner violence (IPV) are well documented, most research has conceptualized IPV as a unitary construct and has primarily focused on the impact of physical violence. However, recent theoretical and empirical work suggests that IPV may be heterogeneous, with different consequences associated with different patterns of violence, abuse, and control. This study used latent class analysis to examine the psychosocial consequences associated with different patterns of physical violence, sexual coercion, psychological abuse, and controlling behavior. Data from 676 women and 455 men who were interviewed for the 2004 Canadian General Social Survey on Victimization were analyzed. The results suggest that experiencing any pattern of violence is associated with a range of negative psychosocial outcomes for both women and men. However, they also show the increasingly negative impact and perceived dangerousness of IPV for those experiencing more severe and chronic patterns of violence and control. These findings were particularly pronounced for women as they experienced the most chronic pattern of abuse and control documented in the study. The psychosocial consequences were also greater for women than for men with similar experiences of IPV. These results suggest that the psychosocial impact of IPV is influenced by gender and by the nature of the violence, abuse, and control experienced.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260510370600

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

3 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Jewkes, R., Sen, P. & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002). Sexual violence. In E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, & R. Lozano (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 147-181). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. Muthén, L.K., 1998, Mplus user’s guide
  3. Statistics Canada., 2005, User’s guide to the Public Use Microdata File
  4. World Health Assembly., 1996, Prevention of violence: A public health priority (WHA49.25)
  5. World Health Organization., 1997, Violence against women: A priority health issue

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 246

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ansara, D. L., & Hindin, M. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Ansara, Donna L.
ORCID
Hindin, Michelle J.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2010-05-25
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1628-1645
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
DOI
10.1177/0886260510370600
OpenAlex
W2149580980
Cited by
247
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
intimate partner violence, psychosocial consequences, sexual coercion, psychological violence, controlling behavior, physical violence, gender differences, chronic abuse, perceived dangerousness, men
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Sexual Partners, Domestic Violence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review