Intimate Partner Violence and Completion of Post-Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examination Follow-Up Screening
Open accessAbstract
Sexual assault is a major public health concern associated with significant mental health and medical symptoms. Follow-up screening post-sexual assault medical forensic examination (SAMFE) can be one method of determining needs and providing targeted prevention of mental health and medical symptoms among individuals who experienced a recent sexual assault. However, the factors associated with engagement in post-SAMFE follow-up screening have not been identified. The current study examined the association between intimate partner violence victimization and sexual assault–related characteristics and engagement in post-SAMFE follow-up screening. Participants were 193 individuals who received a SAMFE and indicated at the time of SAMFE that they were interested in follow-up by the hospital. It was found that individuals were less likely to engage in follow-up screening if the assault was perpetrated by an intimate partner. These findings suggest that other resources are needed to reach individuals who experience sexual assault perpetrated by an intimate partner due to the unique needs of that population.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
An ecological model of the impact of sexual assault on women's mental health
Campbell, R., Dworkin, E., & Cabral, G. (2009) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838009334456 · Cited by 997 · see citing works
Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis
Dworkin, E. R., Menon, S. V., Bystrynski, J., & Allen, N. E. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.002 · Cited by 825 · cited 4× · see citing works
“, posttraumatic stress disorder), highlighting the importance of enhanced access to services for this vulnerable population (Campbell et al., 2009; Dworkin et al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialCalton, J. M., Cattaneo, L. B., & Gebhard, K. T. (2016) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838015585318 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Campbell, R., Patterson, D., & Lichty, L. F. (2005) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838005280328 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Receipt of Post-Rape Medical Care in a National Sample of Female Victims
Zinzow, H. M., Resnick, H. S., Barr, S. C., Danielson, C. K., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.025 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Injury at the time of assault is consistent with widely held rape scripts and predicts receiving medical care following the sexual assault (Zinzow et al., 2012) and attending follow-up exams after a SAMFE (Ackerman et al., 2006).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wright, E. N., Miyamoto, S., & Anderson, J. (2024) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012231156153 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Of those individuals who receive a SA exam, only 28 – 36% follow up with recommended care or resources (Ackerman et al., 2006; Darnell et al., 2015; Gilmore et al., 2018; Holmes et al., 1998).”
Background
- Authors
- Gilmore, A. K., Jaffe, A. E., Hahn, C. K., Ridings, L. E., Gill-Hopple, K., Lazenby, G. B., & Flanagan, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gilmore, Amanda K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 13-14
- Pages
- 5991-6004
- ISSN
- 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6518
- PMC
- PMC8206520
- OpenAlex
- W2905073201
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR001450)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA042935)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K23AA023845)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, sexual assault, forensic medical examination, follow-up screening, intimate partner perpetrators, sexual assault survivors, mental health needs, clinical symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Sex Offenses, Sexual Partners, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review