Cited by 90Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Trauma

Receipt of Post-Rape Medical Care in a National Sample of Female Victims

Open access
Zinzow, Heidi M., Resnick, Heidi S., Barr, Simone C., Danielson, Carla K., Kilpatrick, Dean G.·2012·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background It is important for rape victims to receive medical care to prevent and treat rape-related diseases and injuries, access forensic exams, and connect to needed resources. Few victims seek care, and factors associated with post-rape medical care-seeking are poorly understood. Purpose The current study examined prevalence and factors associated with post-rape medical care-seeking in a national sample of women who reported a most-recent or only incident of forcible rape, and drug- or alcohol-facilitated/incapacitated rape when they were aged ≥14 years. Methods A national sample of U.S. adult women (N=3001) completed structured telephone interviews in 2006, and data for this study were analyzed in 2011. Logistic regression analyses examined demographic variables, health, rape characteristics, and post-rape concerns in relation to post-rape medical care-seeking among 445 female rape victims. Results A minority of rape victims (21%) sought post-rape medical attention following the incident. In the final multivariate model, correlates of medical care included black race, rape-related injury, concerns about sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancy concerns, and reporting the incident to police. Conclusions Women who experience rapes consistent with stereotypic scenarios, acknowledge the rape, report the rape, and harbor health concerns appear to be more likely to seek post-rape medical services. Education is needed to increase rape acknowledgment, awareness of post-rape services that do not require formal reporting, and recognition of the need to treat rape-related health problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.025

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many individuals still do not seek SA exams following an experience of SA due to fear, barriers to access, or lack of understanding about SA exams.

    “many individuals still do not seek SA exams following an experience of SA due to fear, barriers to access, or lack of understanding about SA exams (Fisher et al., 2003; Zinzow et al., 2012).”

    From “Having One Person Tell Me I Didn’t Do the Wrong Thing”: The Impact of Support on the Post-Sexual Assault Exam Experience (2024) · cites this paper as Zinzow et al., 2012

    The Results report that only 21% of the sampled rape victims received post-rape medical attention. The Discussion’s Implications section identifies stigma, service accessibility, and lack of knowledge as potential barriers, but the study does not establish that these caused people to forgo sexual-assault exams specifically; it measured medical attention more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Paras ML Murad MH Chen LP Sexual abuse and lifetime diagnosis of somatic disorders JAMA 2009 302 5 550 61 19654389
  2. [15]Young WW Bracken AC Goddard MA Matheson S Sexual assault: review of a national model protocol and forensic medical evaluation Obstet Gynecol 1992 80 878 83 1407933

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zinzow, H. M., Resnick, H. S., Barr, S. C., Danielson, C. K., & Kilpatrick, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Zinzow, Heidi M.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
183-187
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068280956
Cited by
90
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA023099)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
rape, sexual assault, medical care seeking, sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy concerns, police reporting, health care utilization, racial differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Rape, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Mandatory Reporting, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review