Cited by 11Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and Neglect

Survivors’ Concerns During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Insights From the National Sexual Assault Online Hotline

Open access
Elliott, Shannon A., Bardwell, Emma S., Kamke, Kristyn, Mullin, Tara M., Goodman, Kimberly L.·2023·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implementation of stay-at-home orders in March 2020, experts warned of the possible threat of increased interpersonal violence among individuals isolated with abusers. Researchers have sought to understand how the pandemic impacted victims primarily through the analysis of administrative data sources, such as hospital and police records. However, the preponderance of this data shows a decrease in formal help-seeking among victims during the pandemic, speaking to an impaired access to services but limiting our understanding of other ways in which the pandemic has affected survivors. To overcome these limitations, we examined data collected about users of the National Sexual Assault Online Hotline (NSAOH). Information was collected through staff based on retrospective recall following one-on-one chat sessions with 470 victims of sexual violence who contacted the NSAOH in the first six months of the pandemic and discussed COVID-19-related concerns. We qualitatively examined open-ended descriptions of COVID-19-related concerns and identified the four most common: (1) mental health concerns, (2) creation or exacerbation of an unsafe living situation, (3) not being able to access services, and (4) not having access to a mandatory reporter or trusted adult. These findings demonstrate the myriad ways in which the pandemic affected the lives of victims of sexual violence and can inform practices for services and practitioners to best mee…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/08862605221080936

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study in the United States of survivors who used a national SA hotline reported that mental health, safety, and limited access to support services were the most pressing concerns for survivors.

    “A study in the United States of survivors who used a national SA hotline reported that mental health, safety, and limited access to support services were the most pressing concerns for survivors.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, S. A., Bardwell, E. S., Kamke, K., Mullin, T. M., & Goodman, K. L.
Affiliations
Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network, Research and Evaluation, Washington DC, USA
Corresponding author
Goodman, Kimberly L.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2022-03-26
Volume
38
Issue
1-2
Pages
84-107
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W4220734702
Cited by
11
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, sexual assault survivors, help-seeking, mental illness, access to services, mandatory reporting, safety planning, intimate partner violence, stay-at-home orders, sexual assault services
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Sex Offenses, Hotlines, Survivors, Crime Victims, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review