The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TO VEIL OR NOT TO VEIL?: A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas
Abstract
The increasingly pervasive practice of veiling among Muslim women has stimulated a great deal of scholarly investigation and debate. This study brings empirical evidence to bear on current debates about the meaning of the veil in Islam. This article first examines the conflicting meanings of the veil among Muslim religious elites and Islamic feminists. Although the dominant gender discourse among Muslim elites strongly favors this cultural practice, an antiveiling discourse promulgated by Islamic feminists has gained ground within recent years. This study then examines how these discursive disputes affect gender identity negotiation among veiled and unveiled Muslim women living in Austin, Texas. Interviews with these women highlight how their gender identities reproduce and reformulate existing Muslim gender discourses. Special attention is paid to the subjective disparities and points of congruence between both groups of respondents. This study concludes by suggesting avenues for future research on the intersection of gender, religion, and cultural difference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: A Theory of Gendered Organizations
ACKER, J. (1990) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124390004002002 · Cited by 7,374
(1986) · Cited by 3,447
KANDIYOTI, D. (1988) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124388002003004 · Cited by 3,081
The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology.
Sprague, J., & Smith, D. E. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073155 · Cited by 2,455
The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-0607 · Cited by 2,143
WEST, C., & FENSTERMAKER, S. (1995) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124395009001002 · Cited by 1,337
Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate.
Kapteijns, L., & Ahmed, L. (1993) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2166487 · Cited by 1,054
Women and gender in Islam: historical roots of a modern debate
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-1125 · Cited by 789
The veil and the male elite: a feminist interpretation of women's rights in Islam
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3501 · Cited by 690
Tradition in a Rootless World: Women Turn to Orthodox Judaism
Davidman, L. (1991) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520911574 · Cited by 368
Cited by
A Narrative Approach to Collective Identities*
Brown, A. D. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00609.x · Cited by 543
Becoming Muslim: The Development of a Religious Identity
Peek, L. (2005) · Sociology of Religion · doi:10.2307/4153097 · Cited by 503
Governing the ethical consumer: identity, choice and the primary care medical encounter
McDonald, R., Mead, N., Cheraghi‐Sohi, S., Bower, P., Whalley, D., & Roland, M. (2007) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00493.x · Cited by 78
Untitled work
Botz-Bornstein, T. (2013) · Journal of Religion and Popular Culture
Metadata
- Authors
- READ, J. G., & BARTKOWSKI, J. P.
- Venue
- Gender & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 395-417
- ISSN
- 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3977
- OpenAlex
- W2114821019
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 98.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TO VEIL OR NOT TO VEIL?: A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/089124300014003003
- The paper
- READ, J. G., & BARTKOWSKI, J. P. (2000). TO VEIL OR NOT TO VEIL?: A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas. Gender & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014003003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.