The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research∗
England, K. V. L. (1994) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x · Cited by 2,075
Blackman, L., Cromby, J., Hook, D., Papadopoulos, D., & Walkerdine, V. (2008) · Subjectivity · doi:10.1057/sub.2008.8 · Cited by 289
What else? some more ways of thinking and doing ‘Children's Geographies’
Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2006) · Children's Geographies · doi:10.1080/14733280600577459 · Cited by 286
Doing Good and Feeling Bad: the work of women university teachers
Acker, S., & Feuerverger, G. (1996) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0305764960260309 · Cited by 286
Integrated Motherhood: Beyond Hegemonic Ideologies of Motherhood
Dow, D. M. (2016) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.12264 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1988-09-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 26-0607-26-0607
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4295815424
- Cited by
- 2,143
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.26-0607
- The paper
- The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. (1988). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.26-0607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
