CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9,367Gender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept

Open access
Connell, R. W., Messerschmidt, James W.·2005·Gender & Society
DOI 10.1177/0891243205278639
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The concept of hegemonic masculinity has influenced gender studies across many academic fields but has also attracted serious criticism. The authors trace the origin of the concept in a convergence of ideas in the early 1980s and map the ways it was applied when research on men and masculinities expanded. Evaluating the principal criticisms, the authors defend the underlying concept of masculinity, which in most research use is neither reified nor essentialist. However, the criticism of trait models of gender and rigid typologies is sound. The treatment of the subject in research on hegemonic masculinity can be improved with the aid of recent psychological models, although limits to discursive flexibility must be recognized. The concept of hegemonic masculinity does not equate to a model of social reproduction; we need to recognize social struggles in which subordinated masculinities influence dominant forms. Finally, the authors review what has been confirmed from early formulations (the idea of multiple masculinities, the concept of hegemony, and the emphasis on change) and what needs to be discarded (onedimensional treatment of hierarchy and trait conceptions of gender). The authors suggest reformulation of the concept in four areas: a more complex model of gender hierarchy, emphasizing the agency of women; explicit recognition of the geography of masculinities, emphasizing the interplay among local, regional, and global levels; a more specific treatment of embodiment in contexts of privilege and power; and a stronger emphasis on the dynamics of hegemonic masculinity, recognizing internal contradictions and the possibilities of movement toward gender democracy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891243205278639

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 133 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Baca Zinn, M., 1982, Journal of Ethnic Studies, 10, 29
  2. Bourdieu, P., 2001, Masculine domination
  3. Bufkin, J. L., 1999, Social Justice, 26, 155
  4. Cockburn, C., 1991, In the way of men: Men's resistance to sex equality in organizations
  5. Connell, R. W., 1987, Gender and power
  6. Connell, R. W., 1990, Sport, men and the gender order
  7. Connell, R. W., 1995, Masculinities
  8. Connell, R. W., 2002, Gender
  9. 10.1080/1468077032000080112 · DOI
  10. Denborough, D., 1996, Men's ways of being
  11. Dinges, M., Program for the Hegemoniale Männlichkeiten conference, 24
  12. Donaldson, M., 1991, Time of our lives: Labor and love in the working class
  13. Donaldson, M., 2004, Ruling Australia: The power, privilege& politics of the new ruling class
  14. Freud, Sigmund, 1917, From the history of an infantile neurosis. Complete psychological works
  15. Friedman, R. M., 1986, Psychoanalytic Review, 73
  16. Gerschick, T. J., 1994, Masculinities, 2, 34
  17. Halberstam, J., 1998, Female masculinity
  18. Holter, Ø. G., 1997, Gender, patriarchy and capitalism: A social forms analysis
  19. Holter, Ø. G., 2003, Can men do it? Men and gender equality—The Nordic experience
  20. Kessler, S. J., 1982, Ockers and disco-maniacs
  21. Martino, W., 1995, English in Australia, 112, 11
  22. Messerschmidt, J. W., 1995, Masculinities, 3, 1
  23. Messerschmidt, J. W., 2004, Flesh & blood: Adolescent gender diversity and violence
  24. Meuser, M., 2001, Diskurs, 1, 44
  25. Meuser, M., 2003, Amongmen: Moulding masculinities
  26. Newburn, T., 1994, Just boys doing business? Men, masculinities, and crime
  27. Pease, B., 2001, A man's world? Changing men's practices in a globalized world
  28. Schwalbe, M., 1992, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 37, 29
  29. Snodgrass, J., 1977, For men against sexism: Abook of readings
  30. Taga, F., 2003, Asian masculinities
  31. Thorne, B., 1993, Gender play
  32. Thornton, M., 1989, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 17, 115
  33. Zaretsky, E., 1975, Socialist Revolution, 4, 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Southern Maine (US)
ORCID
Venue
Gender & Society
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2005-12
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
829-859
ISSN
  • 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3977
DOI
10.1177/0891243205278639
OpenAlex
W2129749811
Semantic Scholar
0f219ecc8bf348a2e16360666dfdeea21420231e
Cited by
9,367
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 830 · 2025: 781 · 2024: 605 · 2023: 658 · 2022: 639 · 2021: 658 · 2020: 646 · 2019: 620 · 2018: 561 · 2017: 548 · 2016: 467 · 2015: 482 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 385 · 2012: 289
FWCI
150.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
  • Intellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
hegemonic masculinity, masculinity, gender hierarchy, subordinated masculinities, multiple masculinities, hegemony, social reproduction, gender democracy, embodiment, women's agency, social change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review