Cited by 385Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchGender, Health, and Social InequalityFeminist Theory and Gender Studies

You Have to Show Strength: An Exploration of Gender, Race, and Depression

Beauboeuf-Lafontant, Tamara·2007·Gender & Society

Abstract

Investigating the possible overlap between depressed and presumably strong Black women, this article maintains that women's experiences of depression are both gendered and raced. A review of clinical and popular literatures examining Black women's experiences of depression as well as findings from an interview study with a nonclinical sample of 44 Black women suggest that the discourse of being strong may normalize a distressinducing level of selflessness and powerlessness among such women. Implications of this study include the need to consider the racially specific ways in which women are placed at risk for and experience depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891243206294108

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beauboeuf-Lafontant (2007) identified themes of a cultural mandate of strength, self-silencing, excessive attunement to others' needs, and denial of one's own needs, along with positive aspects of showing strength.

    “She uncovered several themes, including the cultural mandate of strength, self-silencing, excessive attunement to the needs of others, and denial of one’s own needs; similar to the current study, she identified positive characteristics of showing strength (e.g., enhancing success with goals, assertiveness, and moral character).”

    From Superwoman Schema: African American Women’s Views on Stress, Strength, and Health (2010) · cites this paper as Beauboeuf-Lafontant, 2007

  • For most women in Beauboeuf-Lafontant (2007), especially those raising children or caring for loved ones, being strong contributed to selflessness, powerlessness, and self-silencing that led to psychological distress and higher depression risk.

    “However, for a majority of the women (particularly those in the midst of childrearing and those who served as caretakers for their loved ones), being strong contributed to levels of selflessness, powerlessness, and self-silencing that contributed to psychological distress and heightened risk for depression (Beauboeuf-Lafontant, 2007).”

    From Superwoman Schema: African American Women’s Views on Stress, Strength, and Health (2010) · cites this paper as Beauboeuf-Lafontant, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Beauboeuf-Lafontant, T.
Affiliations
DePauw University
Venue
Gender & Society
Published
2007-02
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
28-51
ISSN
  • 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3977
OpenAlex
W2106162032
Cited by
385
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
33.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
Keywords
depression, Black women, race and gender, altruism, powerlessness, intersectionality, women's mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review